From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Carsten Mattner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: NaCl support for Emacs Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:58:44 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87ipkiakqq.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <8739bma0i9.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20120111.134910.720106799840715497.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <871ur69r7e.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1326297544 22719 80.91.229.12 (11 Jan 2012 15:59:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:59:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Harald Hanche-Olsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 11 16:58:58 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rl0Zm-0003AR-CK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:58:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52539 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rl0Zm-0008Tn-03 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:58:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42868) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rl0Ze-0008SU-8P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:58:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rl0ZZ-0007Yl-WC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:58:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-gx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.161.169]:45335) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rl0ZZ-0007Yf-Tl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:58:45 -0500 Original-Received: by ggnp4 with SMTP id p4so467474ggn.0 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 07:58:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=po9AEeVoKeVf4ciliyWspHbxw4Mm6MzRkctnzjlNU/E=; b=AXzo8hJ8GuDM5jArCM6DmxysKcVq/TkIxuu3q/1OdwkWEP53KGMmfs5GFBQxMCuTV7 BGBAP5lAxCk2+8pntD/6G2bpjuJV8ESGpL0ALp6p0cxljNyUa1W5HrvtJCQkjzFKAPGJ nZZhZqwYrtssvOM3PVw0fZRNpqiXz9oAr20LA= Original-Received: by 10.50.88.230 with SMTP id bj6mr7671290igb.26.1326297524868; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 07:58:44 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.50.18.41 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 07:58:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <871ur69r7e.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.161.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147588 Archived-At: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull w= rote: > Harald Hanche-Olsen writes: > =A0> As far as I know the term "public domain", there is really only one > =A0> kind, so you cannot attach license conditions to something in the > =A0> public domain. > > Sure, but that's assuming that Carsten knows what the public domain > is. =A0No offense intended, I just don't know him. =A0OTOH, Bernstein's I'm not offended, but find it funny that you'd have to know me to know whether I know what public domain is. I get what you intend to express with that. Mildly amused and yes you're right, I'm no licensing expert. > reputation as a copyright crank is well-deserved, you know, even if > it's been several years since he changed his mind. =A0Unfortunately, > that attitude has meant that his software, which is universally > respected for its security and performance, has been relegated to the > backwaters of FLOSS (because it usually wasn't). All I know about public domain is that it's not a license per se and something similar to how old recordings of Bach are free for most useses after n years. Which is something a couple politicians intend to extend so that n is more than 70 or 100 (don't remember the values say for the US).