bug#51102: [PATCH] Make speedbar XEmacs compatibility mode obsolete (etags)

[Eric Ludlam <ericludlam@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1224 bytes --]

Yes, that could be, though my recollection is that the opposite was more
common back in the day.  I don't know what the current balance might be.

I spent a lot of time pulling in a wide array of taggers to solve this type
of problem.  After speedbar I switched to putting them in semantic tags
instead which had more utility than the more focused speedbar feature while
still working fine in speedbar.

Eric

On Sun, Oct 10, 2021, 1:51 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: Eric Ludlam <ericludlam@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 12:31:43 -0400
> > Cc: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>, 51102@debbugs.gnu.org,
> >       "Eric M. Ludlam" <zappo@gnu.org>
> >
> > That was a very long time ago so I don't remember any specifics from
> then, but I can think of two reasons
> > imenu is better.
> >
> > One, you don't need to save the file and run an external command.
> >
> > Two, imenu has some nice binning it does to make the tags more navigable.
> >
> > I don't recall specific issues with etags within speedbar though, so
> "robust" is probably not the right word
> > here.
>
> Thanks.
>
> is it possible that some files will be in a programming language that
> imenu doesn't support, but etags does?
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2054 bytes --]