Ah okay thanks, will use reply all then.
Yes indeed, I think adding only that would make it less confusing because the word "execute" is somewhat ambiguous here. Then people get a hint and can look it up (looking a bit more I think the C-j functionality is "not really over-advertised"). Of course the part "execute example code" could link to section 27.7 of the Elisp manual and/or in a "Lisp Interaction buffer" could become a link to section 27.10. It might be a little excessive, but the excessive documentation is one of the aspects that makes Emacs my favorite editor. But otherwise just adding the few words would make it much clearer for me already.
Thanks again for your great work!