Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?

[Tim Cross <theophilusx@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1546 bytes --]

The mouse button number verses left, right middle button highlights one of
the limitations with adopting 'popular' terminology. Many of these other
applications have limited facilities for binding mouse buttons. Often, if
you have a mouse with more than 3 buttons, you can't use them or you have
to go to weird nonintuitive lengths to use them. Emacs does not suffer from
such a limitation. and the binding mechanism is the same regardless of the
button. Using left, middle and right is in fact a very poor choice because
it falls down as soon as you have a mouse with a different form factor, use
the mouse in the left hand instead of right or use a device like a touch
pad, foot peddle/pad or one of the many adaptive technology devices used by
someone with a disability. meanwhile, mouse-1, mouse-2, mouse-n remain
clear and unambigious.

On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 12:52, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:

> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
> As long as Emacs is designed to use multiple mouse buttons, the
> terminology for UIs with only one button -- or for touch screens -- is
> not pertinent to documenting Emacs.
>
> --
> Dr Richard Stallman
> Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
> Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
> Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
>
>
>
>

-- 
regards,

Tim

--
Tim Cross

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2263 bytes --]