Re: company.el status?

[Tim Cross <theophilusx@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1083 bytes --]

My question as well. While I won't lose any sleep should we give up on bzr
and move to git, I am very concerned regarding further fracturing of the
emacs ecosystem if that means using a platform which is using non-free
tools. Git != GitHub. Lets have all official emacs packages use git, but on
gnu.org. If we start moving things out to various other locations, before
long, we will have forks and different versions all over the place, leaving
an envrionment where only the determined and experienced emacser has any
hope - all new users will run a mile.




On 9 March 2013 19:19, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
> > Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 03:50:53 +0400
> > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Nikolaj Schumacher <me@nschum.de>
> >
> > Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> >
> > > I am told that Github has features that don't work unless
> > > you run nonfree Javascript.
> >
> > That's an accurate assertion. The core features all seem to work,
> > though, even when JavaScript is disabled.
>
> Why do we need Github?
>
>


-- 
Tim Cross

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1761 bytes --]