From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Howard Melman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#54970: 28.1; Some emoji no longer display Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 16:07:38 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ee1xdsc8.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfqdcc2c.fsf@gnus.org> <47359AAC-A4C5-4C1A-A6B4-2ACAD44A3459@gmail.com> <83sfqdyo7s.fsf@gnu.org> <7F25712C-DDA8-4BB1-951A-B3445C35834F@gmail.com> <83o810zxz8.fsf@gnu.org> <8C4B6A53-73D4-43F5-A3BE-9598EB06F843@gmail.com> <83bkx0zvcd.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20610"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, alan@idiocy.org, 54970@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 16 22:08:10 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nfoiI-0005Dy-C3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2022 22:08:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59192 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nfoiG-0007ip-Su for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2022 16:08:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44770) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nfoiA-0007iR-VT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2022 16:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40472) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nfoiA-0001eB-N5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2022 16:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nfoiA-0005x8-GG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2022 16:08:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Howard Melman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 20:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54970 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 54970-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54970.165013966722857 (code B ref 54970); Sat, 16 Apr 2022 20:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 54970) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2022 20:07:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34369 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nfohv-0005wb-Jr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2022 16:07:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt1-f172.google.com ([209.85.160.172]:42624) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nfohu-0005wN-3D for 54970@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2022 16:07:46 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt1-f172.google.com with SMTP id t2so7873128qtw.9 for <54970@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 16 Apr 2022 13:07:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=okxb0uVBXqCz83cnP4DDoIY1ztY8z+qM6c3MsxApQS0=; b=L274rV6PccuUnEVlca4hC7YPrdrQAyceAYNAPcucT9T/I92OtODSIb2M15O61vXgpP cAiUL3RcqtHoZLwOVo//XopU7+grLQBbhavsbfqz7A24fv9dfVtz8NrMlXlXza3KKPok S6dNx65C3TpV7ao7zFtRzVKPXssUF3lfYce5ujAB+4fG2XgDdYN47+Hhpuh8O16rA4bU u+Q43PcZ7F2hvKfsVDlHCUJ+QuNCM6IDa5YtEnaGKk1NYeWo1MGjaA8Ea7ppgK6yUJv2 4QceFzczDwyQsLwD9qmtTMoXiCBv6Y/KGyFPq1VZiA4EywBLm29CbJppHk2ksL4iVv1K xs1Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=okxb0uVBXqCz83cnP4DDoIY1ztY8z+qM6c3MsxApQS0=; b=RSoi01rvVL22cDCyujRQ8gD89o3Ug+tntzanfqNpTP6byD6TDuINKjoWABZ8hKoLAl YndS+rDYJlfgaTRvZ+YmKMs2nKyegRpV61ALmwHQW2UuEvBcMANkyHsCnhA0UqgAn/kJ CUMHx4e8OVR1d1V+uBezuVHQm+pzysjek8U8hsnoG6PdqRBh5FkZ3ExHpB00xIhQ/r/N KV3NtfiQdtZHUvhr3Fj0SYe8l2ILSqn6ASVGk3vP03RnSHzkNQXz+h3l1EsqBR/n7mxr t9GWiDNMqTDEfM7+ZNHh8WEOSr0mpfX9hSe4UYQ/YD319pnAb+4P4Ne6HoldjoQ5O01A hlXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533RfqI6W3Sz0A4u9EUMDFWSofJkLRa/iXUzZmF+tw1rzBtUoYB3 IrFzndP0g1SzeIq/H3CF/aY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwL+QusumsGONuPYtyx9NPfjc2lcmbyEBHdcfi1/W4ub7WukgYDiDT7zw5KhaqqBQ+kPPWMDQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:604b:0:b0:2f1:d064:35c with SMTP id k11-20020ac8604b000000b002f1d064035cmr3020136qtm.162.1650139660350; Sat, 16 Apr 2022 13:07:40 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from smtpclient.apple (pool-108-26-204-101.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [108.26.204.101]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w10-20020a05620a424a00b00680c0c0312dsm4405638qko.30.2022.04.16.13.07.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 16 Apr 2022 13:07:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83bkx0zvcd.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:230019 Archived-At: > On Apr 16, 2022, at 3:22 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>=20 >> It's not? I don't know anything about emojis in Unicode other than >> it's more complicated than anyone would expect, but I see it in: >> = http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/tree/admin/unidata/emoji-sequen= ces.txt?h=3Demacs-28 >>=20 >> 1F37D FE0F ; Basic_Emoji ; fork and knife with = plate # E0.7 [1] (=F0=9F=8D=BD=EF=B8= =8F) >>=20 >> Or am I misunderstanding something? >=20 > Your recipe didn't mention the U+FE0F codepoint. You only talked > about the lone U+1F37D. When followed by U+FE0F, Emacs indeed ought > to display the sequence as Emoji, and that should not require you to > change the font used for the 'symbol' pseudo-script. Are you saying > that isn't happening in your case? Indeed in Emacs 28 -Q if I C-x 8 RET FORK AND KNIFE WITH PLATE RET C-x 8 RET FE0F RET I see the emoji displayed. If I use the system emoji selector to insert a character into emacs It only puts in "the lone U+1F37D" (at least in emacs where I can check). In other apps this displays as an emoji, in emacs it's a blank. I said, I don't understand this stuff. Is this extra codepoint supposed to be added for me? It doesn't seem like other apps require it. I know this, in Emacs 27 macport I used C-x 8 RET and searched for plate and entered this character into a file and it displayed as an emoji. Several others I entered this way displayed fine too. I upgraded to Emacs 28 and the other characters display fine and this one didn't. =20 I followed the instructions in NEWS and they didn't help. If the answer is just, this kind of emoji is different (though nothing = else really exposes to it me as different), then I think the instructions (in = NEWS or wherever) should just tell me to=20 (set-fontset-font t 'symbol '("My New Emoji Font" . "iso10646-1") nil = 'prepend) and not (set-fontset-font t 'emoji '("My New Emoji Font" . "iso10646-1") nil = 'prepend) But I'd really like to understand the difference. Howard