From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=90=D0=BD=D0=B4=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=B9_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=BC=D0=BE=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28166: 25.2; Batch mode not perfectly noninteractive Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 05:42:39 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87ziau9ewc.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <8360dhd544.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11489b6607db1705573a719b" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1503283459 6888 195.159.176.226 (21 Aug 2017 02:44:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 02:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 28166@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 21 04:44:12 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1djchF-0001Gc-QQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 04:44:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59479 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1djchM-0003Rg-A1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 22:44:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45346) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1djchB-0003Qe-Ek for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 22:44:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1djch8-00018r-4a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 22:44:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38436) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1djch8-00018Y-0p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 22:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1djch7-0003FW-NN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 22:44:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=90=D0=BD=D0=B4=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=B9_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=BC=D0=BE=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 02:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28166 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 28166-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28166.150328340712443 (code B ref 28166); Mon, 21 Aug 2017 02:44:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28166) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2017 02:43:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47117 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1djcgZ-0003Ed-Ac for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 22:43:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qk0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]:34364) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1djcgX-0003EQ-EK for 28166@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 22:43:25 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qk0-f174.google.com with SMTP id u139so76587059qka.1 for <28166@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 19:43:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=cqQQSrMjZwyGPUCHQHh2K8/KiKBFnZmsqDsEqhHbyyA=; b=e/kWRhEOmEYROm99ZyPCrvAXKPxg1UD4VpGN/hW16qQ33u6JuiFq8TGikg+2cS5wJR feHiTm+38yPN+QcR7aSLmY3ExzE0SeOcPFxYwUu7OoB21QFz8+JFz7+TvEYO/NqUvFfZ slliiLHzS/8UzRAKKJ+CtG9cDy+ku7jTwAQoQFlXcr5bFkSCzm8B7P1lui8LhEpTLuci aua+5h8B2NnJPTJZIhtIE1X2JrgQmwQYJX0M3ilQibcLgtnXT3grx+3DvnsVNXTjvVDe eE+R5dvLNkZbQdRLnpJBoWD/uhMpe/EYE8o1o1SelaPHGvacfBkJ92BqHJES4i1jTikj jUmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cqQQSrMjZwyGPUCHQHh2K8/KiKBFnZmsqDsEqhHbyyA=; b=OkPsezbhVAk0eimxbnyKmVszJZ4ZRO/Grb89+cs3jaBaVNPM5pP37ZiuYrxt8jlnjQ O7vYYj259QgGJHQLAu40zYm/YImpQUPkzezVbQbdeBbJEQadkcVPXZAglMGsohRp2s+C m3oUGc/iicKbBF9Sj7ki/R8hspSaBp9g/AEV1ta3i4FDUXpEmoaO/jAnEuQRkrG6FXuN QRanseB+2qTDS3BzbTKJOHE4+pL6fYvUrovBGu9cQL9zFm2ciIIIwY6gcRNLu0sINiDL V17DT3mria2cAdX03TLS3oXfaTgRtEdRQJDUg4v+1+x5ocfr3NTIhYCScNtAm+d1pd8r DznA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5jfA04pdD7DB0doYt+psGOKCumAzIY0qpv5NgXtz/4m2XlGUbeQ ZUe8B0hGTScGoG4nAcaAFomfo7Tf6A== X-Received: by 10.55.70.84 with SMTP id t81mr19826040qka.189.1503283399611; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 19:43:19 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.200.42.170 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 19:42:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8360dhd544.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:135976 Archived-At: --001a11489b6607db1705573a719b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2017-08-21 5:30 GMT+03:00 Eli Zaretskii : > > From: =D0=90=D0=BD=D0=B4=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=B9 =D0=9F=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B0=D0= =BC=D0=BE=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2 > > > > Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 04:15:06 +0300 > > Cc: 28166@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > I think the logical behavior for > > $C:\emacs\bin\emacs.exe --script test.el > > would be the same as for > > $C:\emacs\bin\emacs.exe --script test.el < NUL > > Why? Shell scripts can read input from the keyboard, can't they? > I thought that "noninteractive" means precisely: do not read from keyboard. However I'm not sure now. How do other (e.g Lisp) interpreters behave in similar circumstances? Best wishes, Andrey Paramonov --001a11489b6607db1705573a719b Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2017= -08-21 5:30 GMT+03:00 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>:
> From: =D0=90=D0=BD=D0=B4=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=B9 =D0=9F= =D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=BC=D0=BE=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<cm= r.pent@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 04:15:06 +0300
> Cc: 28166@debbugs.gnu.org=
>
> I think the logical behavior for
> $C:\emacs\bin\emacs.exe --script test.el
> would be the same as for
> $C:\emacs\bin\emacs.exe --script test.el < NUL

Why?=C2=A0 Shell scripts can read input from the keyboard, can't= they?
=C2=A0
I thought that "noninter= active" means precisely:
do not read f= rom keyboard.

However I'm not sure now. How do other (e.g Lisp) interpreters = behave in similar circumstances?

=
Best wishes,
And= rey Paramonov

--001a11489b6607db1705573a719b--