From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mathias Dahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: icomplete-mode vs. iswitchb Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:56:14 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c223acad477304ed2b2065 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386669399 23590 80.91.229.3 (10 Dec 2013 09:56:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:56:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Alex Schroeder , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 10 10:56:45 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VqK3Y-0007Rp-UA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:56:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48188 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqK3Y-0001Oc-JV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 04:56:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44264) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqK3T-0001Il-DW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 04:56:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqK3S-00016j-3U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 04:56:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]:49008) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqK3Q-00015D-4M; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 04:56:36 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hq4so5118186wib.3 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 01:56:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=OInfmFyTnvkNyJxrqghirz9e5lhjuBjMn95lgSbteyI=; b=bsbRrWXPyJEbQbIehEYA9zjvnuHf2pYKdQI9TZR0yXpJsqNW/5RY19CRkVGlKVY+CX WSQHID80GGhblc/0W2ppVtuXD996r1ytUp15xbtb1W17Te1cGIsP1zZbsJYLVbPmT78M Ix+FdOvTI0ZLYwEewtt515qmAvafSNeQYqNhvrf6DgpuwFLrU/d/+yNasoP7DsJH9CSA wg3Jr5LrAISdCg8O2/lzAkuWi8PNoWHRpAPari2dP62MRle7S87hB2J8Oij4cd8A/jpE Ps5m2r1Nv+CYY/SZyDKHlkFzmlWN9sqhy3DrjJvKyyUhSPqkHRs1O3eEA2EA/tSWi0+z VnNg== X-Received: by 10.180.12.70 with SMTP id w6mr18524166wib.4.1386669394444; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 01:56:34 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.194.83.104 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 01:56:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::230 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:166256 Archived-At: --001a11c223acad477304ed2b2065 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > But the completion hint is totally weird. If I type just one "o" > > above, it works as it should. > > I don't see much difference between the "oo" case you've shown and the > "o" case, so I don't see why one "works as it should" while the other > "is totally weird". > > Can you explain a bit more? You're right, there is no difference. I must have been drunk, or something... ;) Still, regardless of I type "o" or "oo", I do not see the full buffer names in the list of hits. However, if I type "e" instead I see all buffer names that match "e", including foo.el and foo.template. Does this scenario work well for you? /Mathias --001a11c223acad477304ed2b2065 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> But the completion hint i= s totally weird. =A0If I type just one "o"
> above, it works as it should.

I don't see much difference between the "oo" case you&#= 39;ve shown and the
"o" case, so I don't see why one "works as it should&quo= t; while the other
"is totally weird".

Can you explain a bit more?

You're righ= t, there is no difference. I must have been drunk, or something... ;)
=

Still, regardless of I type "o" or "oo&q= uot;, I do not see the full buffer names in the list of hits. However, if I= type "e" instead I see all buffer names that match "e"= , including foo.el and foo.template.

Does this scenario work well for you?

/Mathias
--001a11c223acad477304ed2b2065--