From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Anders Lindgren Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23465: 25.0.93; `lambda' after hash-quote not highlighted as keyword Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 11:19:33 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83zirxc22i.fsf@gnu.org> <56d56c19-466b-9aaa-c7a3-18c95c848091@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114ffebe34b01405328d8a1c X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462958429 23150 80.91.229.3 (11 May 2016 09:20:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 09:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23465@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 11 11:20:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b0QJP-0006PE-7i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 11:20:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51168 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0QJO-0000bA-I6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 05:20:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56065) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0QJK-0000ZI-8A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 05:20:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0QJF-0008KO-V0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 05:20:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34341) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0QJF-0008KK-S7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 05:20:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b0QJF-0000EK-O9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 05:20:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Anders Lindgren Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 09:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23465 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23465-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23465.1462958382853 (code B ref 23465); Wed, 11 May 2016 09:20:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23465) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2016 09:19:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46678 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b0QIw-0000Dh-9m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 05:19:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vk0-f41.google.com ([209.85.213.41]:34563) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b0QIt-0000DU-P0 for 23465@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 05:19:40 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-vk0-f41.google.com with SMTP id m188so49328304vka.1 for <23465@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 11 May 2016 02:19:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=knCdIN/WofYXbRgWMDzCsR2ns6uhAA7JRJRYuwZAYhA=; b=kXYeurKxzCnroQfKAp4L1G8nZiUJ7BHEYSDaxlvWG3e2HrzLeJslOEnPLQ8q/kPki9 yit8BG/sw5fu9P8q84/zK/cZoST+SNK7zSEuVCEn5/nkt1nNmMViDT9nDHuatwWkTX60 G6DArbQW+iXsXj8NO2IqkrmhL5Us2N931oHBQmLjLutceBBK32HO65i+UlG2MphBakRH qWRPFYD7b7idUPmhVcilglChsC/LyBFDiK4fuypiUVTSzdZjxcC18Rc96AnDrK3qmh4O i3NFaYu+UJZp5nbBLG/5InJYuUSjmaRi9WAvGQLJMCz/fuT9ja8Z8lYqdEy5+/+nHFNI +MMQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=knCdIN/WofYXbRgWMDzCsR2ns6uhAA7JRJRYuwZAYhA=; b=Pe03w1urVcffxhS0mvAMpUQWo+DwE9jNR+cxNByWDFYRhMjlvVj1gxKth2ItviIkgN 4nAg5k96O5vJZmE2ibBQRWt/5+L1hs+iqoaK8JNIJeaQjiut4DXAz7gMASGKqXKOfSBX ja31pwaOL1TTh5IQWr4iyiXdBYIFkJPCw+rPaypfBlrdKmdtAuzRdBkkFbrx8RJHK9WD mAkz5vJ6ZIh6R6M3ru3uJYPIBpjhIk3uvQJ+bPkSVTztbY2OJg7IaajlD2nGX8SqcuQP km+3XY3+zL24RBOnXoBYxLlJFqCle+SctRnUea5FFtE1VPTCp67HccTAlrMWG/JMPQYw pVrw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVjV8oZ5kyGtqwpTI8jAZIdQDMxvdeXXs5GtGk8CvQrQwvevWeH7jqXhVOIZrlKR9btnsml7kPwGZIxtA== X-Received: by 10.176.68.66 with SMTP id m60mr1150333uam.53.1462958374036; Wed, 11 May 2016 02:19:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.31.214.131 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2016 02:19:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <56d56c19-466b-9aaa-c7a3-18c95c848091@yandex.ru> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:118103 Archived-At: --001a114ffebe34b01405328d8a1c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 05/10/2016 07:25 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Sorry, I don't know anything about that code, and don't consider >> myself an expert on font-lock enough to judge this suggestion. I hope >> someone else will chime in. >> > > FWIW, LGTM. > > But should we encourage this use of sharp quotes? There is no need to > quote lambdas; sharp quote doesn't hurt, but is there a case where it would > help with a lambda? > > As an aside, it would be great if we could get rid of the duplication > between lisp--el-non-funcall-position-p vs elisp--form-quoted-p, > elisp--expect-function-p and some bits inside elisp-completion-at-point. Or > reduce it, at least. > --001a114ffebe34b01405328d8a1c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Dmitry Gutov = <dgutov@yandex.ru<= /a>> wrote:
On= 05/10/2016 07:25 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

Sorry, I don't know anything about that code, and don't consider myself an expert on font-lock enough to judge this suggestion.=C2=A0 I hope=
someone else will chime in.

 FWIW, LGTM.

But should we encourage this use of sharp quotes? There is no need to quote= lambdas; sharp quote doesn't hurt, but is there a case where it would = help with a lambda?

As an aside, it would be great if we could get rid of the duplication betwe= en lisp--el-non-funcall-position-p vs elisp--form-quoted-p, elisp--expect-f= unction-p and some bits inside elisp-completion-at-point. Or reduce it, at = least.

--001a114ffebe34b01405328d8a1c--