From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vinicius Latorre Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: On language-dependent defaults for character-folding Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:03:53 -0200 Message-ID: References: <87mvr9wxqz.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87io1xwq1e.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87vb5wvzfz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87io1wt4cc.fsf@wanadoo.es> <8737syoima.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871t8iu277.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87y4apfpr6.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87wpq9qwia.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87k2m7qse0.fsf@wanadoo.es> <878u2mqhnl.fsf@wanadoo.es> <878u2jpy0t.fsf@fastmail.fm> <834md7wdtg.fsf@gnu.org> <8737srw18s.fsf@fastmail.fm> <837fi3um8b.fsf@gnu.org> <56C4FB25.9070203@cornell.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff2482f29cff0052c001a6a X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455753857 16234 80.91.229.3 (18 Feb 2016 00:04:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:04:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, rms@gnu.org, Joost Kremers , per.starback@gmail.com, emacs-devel , Eli Zaretskii To: Ken Brown Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 18 01:04:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aWC4o-0000Zu-WE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:04:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34695 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWC4o-00031i-7w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:04:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40544) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWC4e-00030j-RA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:04:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWC4Y-0001r6-QK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:04:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::236]:33866) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWC4Y-0001qw-Iz; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:03:54 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ob0-x236.google.com with SMTP id wb13so41585423obb.1; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:03:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=N/q24QYyDsf43lBPDYjXPz6og3al0PCGesN8hirOKdI=; b=pZb+brnKPJlRsE1TVjBosU6v22KqvGeUbkMCchg6nENl4hQHP1yG3cpP7ygKmw+cLS Y2dv+fzuK5bb4IV10LuWY9xcMmVIolWlUx3szeiLhIz1W8asIz2CmU49idDUOKQA3jG3 QHfQdRvyYQ4UxhLPHPaqJATnIqLYt2x9Vw+/1VT9n0/OxHWB6DkvGbZ3SEhDj1KZCnzz tUZvMmvQJvr5SzG2/d+AyHvE+ELNPvgxJNVME/AMpEDaoqFzxaILekTIEpFj7aM0ztQp mQ5MVDMj6/pof6+YEokIOP+ozNFStTkofM8t1dIVSNEU3q8/TPHfvdkzmydHgRq9+5tK EX6g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=N/q24QYyDsf43lBPDYjXPz6og3al0PCGesN8hirOKdI=; b=KmZuDNIWOecX0cNCGK7AQrCzTYhyFdVdo7ESexQA48ZJK4hjhfkMAnmG/eu713vF86 BpKy00QQezA2m0CtkiAqo7hl6txlBOlV4y4/yVKNzTSwgLukWUV27mx4pX/BE9UYDLRs 2ugcCMiqB8hHA/rmBpCjMorEIvURVRMQUk9qYyBz3KwoBbbLEoN/2j1sH20EakTvhKa5 bTPjQKaxLynkIOwBeM+efN8kv/GCQGvmtpKhsFmCFKA1PmDiqfUbiHx0AbTw4JFAull3 A4fAGFZLQe56Yf2c/eOK5vVXNHjabIHidZKDo7fPYKpy+th5Q2eHPVDMjAVgo+7cQCA9 2+sg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQclXxoJPvMCNg1cv3Ktu5+/di4fBp/rsBqPclHgjWlqI3A9BUOlnSZU4gFTwHa4Y7nyJaukD8ntTINQw== X-Received: by 10.60.144.9 with SMTP id si9mr3730709oeb.81.1455753834121; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:03:54 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.182.80.36 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:03:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56C4FB25.9070203@cornell.edu> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:200104 Archived-At: --e89a8ff2482f29cff0052c001a6a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 My vote is off by default. On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Ken Brown wrote: > On 2/17/2016 3:15 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> From: Joost Kremers >>> Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, per.starback@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, >>> emacs-devel@gnu.org >>> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:06:11 +0100 >>> >>> Actually, my counts indicate that more people want it on by default >>>> than off. >>>> >>> >>> Then put me down for an "off". :-) >>> >> >> Done. >> > > I wrote earlier with positive feedback about character folding, but I > didn't express an opinion about what the default should be. I'm now ready > to cast my vote for having it on by default. > > My reason is that I think many users are likely to find character folding > useful, but they are unlikely to discover that it exists if it is not on by > default. I have read the claims that character folding in its present form > will be viewed as a bug by speakers of certain languages. But I think the > possible benefits to others outweigh the possible harm done to those who > initially think it's a bug. > > Ken > > > --e89a8ff2482f29cff0052c001a6a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
My vote is off by default.



On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:58 PM= , Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu> wrote:
On 2/17/2016 3:15 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:<= br>
From: Joost Kremers <joostkremers@fastmail.fm>
Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es,= per.starback@g= mail.com, rms@gnu.org<= /a>, emacs-devel@g= nu.org
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:06:11 +0100

Actually, my counts indicate that more people want it on by default
than off.

Then put me down for an "off". :-)

Done.

I wrote earlier with positive feedback about character folding, but I didn&= #39;t express an opinion about what the default should be.=C2=A0 I'm no= w ready to cast my vote for having it on by default.

My reason is that I think many users are likely to find character folding u= seful, but they are unlikely to discover that it exists if it is not on by = default.=C2=A0 I have read the claims that character folding in its present= form will be viewed as a bug by speakers of certain languages.=C2=A0 But I= think the possible benefits to others outweigh the possible harm done to t= hose who initially think it's a bug.

Ken



--e89a8ff2482f29cff0052c001a6a--