From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "tenspd137 ." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35969: 26.2, Excorporate Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 16:10:35 -0600 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="190258"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 35969@debbugs.gnu.org To: Thomas Fitzsimmons Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 30 00:13:59 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hW6pZ-000nHA-Hv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 May 2019 00:13:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36325 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hW6pY-0007ou-Ej for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:13:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49833) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hW6mk-0005gu-Sh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:11:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hW6mk-000157-0i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46680) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hW6mj-000153-Tm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:11:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hW6mj-0004Nm-N9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:11:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "tenspd137 ." Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 22:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35969 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35969-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35969.155916785516834 (code B ref 35969); Wed, 29 May 2019 22:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35969) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 May 2019 22:10:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60224 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hW6md-0004NS-DA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:10:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi1-f182.google.com ([209.85.167.182]:41030) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hW6mb-0004ND-DY for 35969@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:10:53 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi1-f182.google.com with SMTP id y10so3385826oia.8 for <35969@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 29 May 2019 15:10:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=V1Y015sZuMNnK2+4xH6HxPquXc2Yx3rhXh/B9WB3zwI=; b=HQ6X9UmVAVtNn8YJeyvQ/w+zTMT2hdTVAwSXdHkM5eINaRENEoxX3za7BUdy5zvSCD abxOcq/EDCmzUXmVfclLcCjQ5po1wA6H358B4SCjObREJxxF+YS3jppV9J8AKRsUY6gp uHWsEOB4gEp4aMD962jiBIWbKHKYuKhdgkordvftyAjnrNXeegQYW6HHkpcHbOXip4/w F49YSYwLMw9W8yLuSfXxt7ryz+pLKkElQW4QzjeKJBB4P5z1yRxK57srVTlMnVXzCH/R 9xZ5kdVxkkolSDW4t8h+Kbl6+l6R0WxE9F4v+PDh6cvWMwzTv91AJaaXfEl+IeRV+xAx 5Amw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=V1Y015sZuMNnK2+4xH6HxPquXc2Yx3rhXh/B9WB3zwI=; b=cQNMgrFve6dLPNXHLVD7T99VOrrOeNqcqrFbcLd8tvYRPRJZ/AV/pNvl2ABBrRFNt1 nZXgx1MLmpK71tbD7m3SuTQKsHnU88JDfVdL5WO0obGpiw5jyKO9F0Qrb4GdCEo29Pxt GXeD1H29n638ZQ2KYOuyBaRq4f6yj1XGGeTW1+iyVpx/11Lzomj2XotnkLMe3uMP7ycF mu+3jNbgEfu9iPxggyCiVhaeOtgOX/SIjVcYbpypu3NZ/YciezVxN+Z3Zt6V/FjBDwjv /UrR1WLHHAhnKB/kivN0nb5/VtQUwooSonFrFWqxqEyECc7Xguhg2Ui7b6wNDEk4zp1H fxEA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVvVPsfkzsfJ7wXmCNnB/sPJwKrz22f458ASzt65RIDMEJXH0RC 4c9SARjKJ+nyalrKB/Bru6SM8R/F9o/pQknPJLmL9jjn X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwvdwCJVhP+vfeFxTxysaQG67h22gfOkjW3VIOu8QZlg4ar03pv+RbHA7l2XK1/+yxIRJ5nWmQ2DmV5QqWuTEg= X-Received: by 2002:aca:f2d5:: with SMTP id q204mr22297oih.14.1559167847449; Wed, 29 May 2019 15:10:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:159899 Archived-At: Yes - I will try to do it tomorrow morning. Thanks again! -C On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 4:01 PM Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote: > > Hi, > > "tenspd137 ." writes: > > > Sorry for questioning - but I don't think it is successful in the > > basic authentication case - unless I am misreading some of the output. > > No problem; I quoted the "status=200" line which I think indicates that > it was successful. But url creates another buffer and puts the > authentication response in there; to be sure, you'd need to check that. > I think for httpbin.org, it will contain the headers and then: > > { > "authenticated": true, > "user": "user" > } > > just like your wget experiment. > > For your prior test run, the secondary buffer is mentioned in > *URL-DEBUG* here: > > > retrieval -> Synchronous fetching done (#) > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Can you redo the httpbin.org authentication test within Emacs, through > the proxies, and paste the contents of that secondary/response buffer? > > It would be helpful if you could paste the redacted secondary/response > buffer contents for the failed Exchange authentication too. > > > As for testing authentication against no proxy - yes, I can. In fact, > > I actually have. It works. > > [...] > > OK, good to know, thanks. The use case makes sense. > > Thanks, > Thomas