From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vladimir Kazanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Overlay-related TODO Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 20:09:00 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83fuu7zhd4.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f251664f4930531911992 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461874171 11361 80.91.229.3 (28 Apr 2016 20:09:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 20:09:31 +0000 (UTC) To: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 28 22:09:30 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1avsFe-0008EJ-4k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 22:09:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50839 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avsFd-0003bE-50 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:09:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51679) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avsFO-0003YX-5Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:09:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avsFL-0000zG-Eb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:09:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c]:35865) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avsFL-0000z4-5W; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:09:11 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id u64so96609815lff.3; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:09:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=PxHA9PgmgNNdG5ZsrFBuH4+K7VPTqbigf5YkatyceTo=; b=DIMJVl1QcxXxbG/syI+RB1JA8uFh4zhJXiXVElBKmvN5cgu04iNQkqLVS4gp7MtGSE 5evfucErWF97VdxhJ7vLsfMuF0nsLv993wrPP8QFai6WMnWDKoI7UiwbfS6ASLen+oUZ RDVNZDAZ2dwnZKfOvXisKRaOXdsqkpuIHNnBG7THWBp5uDuDxUrxcsO1/aec9m3Zxlft ZyDdsWYLJ8q0y5MhYFnuoySPFC+xkMPvdSl1alSJdenGGMekpCnpXwQJB4c/flJRnnrv UoV1ZOU37ZYDVOUotGqvMifUwq9CzKBzDYKi+tTTrNQKpQzdwnrkR798u6TrtK2pT2Jm 4c4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=PxHA9PgmgNNdG5ZsrFBuH4+K7VPTqbigf5YkatyceTo=; b=I1zhsb6N4mDJEZ00Uu+uM1UDy31HMGMrCAy8bx5lFCKuknMxOWZtewN/OjoyZMgzaZ QqO7IZ6BIfbMxw2nKq9bVpGZJGZm5wQ13gBz4g1D0I3yLaRFeZxIMKc4Klt3++R8oTmu AHLIGcY9O0LorQweq0q/gssfxCLVGUIZHQ/Rsslb5qJ8t7w0FSnLgFmnUQaQQgtQz68J lwp4zu8TjbMlaHgLSfkqr2LvKvbROD6uxD+HK1p5qDUTM1sORUctAR6DWjX1PkdZNh3z 2u2S1z3ZPvD56HQvt0QNDwcnBFTDVzgkRQoBM0xSn/0qMhzXjkg9U0HK8xRzhR+fkoOw WVFg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUOP/rm0l2hThZY5meOAEyvgy6C8NTmvQcVELPSBSDgw1EvS/JOzurkke3wg+BwMw7CM49maPSn1gJrqg== X-Received: by 10.25.19.198 with SMTP id 67mr5961975lft.58.1461874149616; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:09:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203404 Archived-At: --001a113f251664f4930531911992 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Stefan, John, Eli, okay, thank you, I'll see what I can do here :-) Vlad On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:57 PM John Wiegley wrote: > >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I think one of the first jobs (not necessarily done by you) should be a > > suite of tests that exercise the functionality and also present the > current > > performance of typical expensive and inexpensive tasks related to > overlays. > > This will be instrumental in both guiding the design and implementation, > and > > in testing the improvements brought by the new code. > > +1 > > -- > John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F > http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2 > --001a113f251664f4930531911992 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stefan, John, Eli,

okay, thank you, I'll see wh= at I can do here :-)

Vlad

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:57 PM John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> I think one of the first jobs (not necessarily done by you) should be = a
> suite of tests that exercise the functionality and also present the cu= rrent
> performance of typical expensive and inexpensive tasks related to over= lays.
> This will be instrumental in both guiding the design and implementatio= n, and
> in testing the improvements brought by the new code.

+1

--
John Wiegley=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = GPG fingerprint =3D 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
htt= p://newartisans.com=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
--001a113f251664f4930531911992--