From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Philipp Stephani Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25605: bug#25606: patches installed for 25605, 25606 Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 21:47:42 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20170201235622.30836-2-eggert@cs.ucla.edu> <5c200659-f482-b2a5-738f-e7710454c376@cs.ucla.edu> <83bmuf71c1.fsf@gnu.org> <99857212-cb7b-7e57-dab1-ba4412815932@cs.ucla.edu> <42bf63df-416e-7623-8f59-862fbd55f2f3@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113dffc05642d80547f7b3f6 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1486504161 18700 195.159.176.226 (7 Feb 2017 21:49:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 21:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 25605@debbugs.gnu.org, 25606@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Eggert , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 07 22:49:12 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cbDdO-0004Dg-1x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 22:49:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56519 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cbDdR-0002g0-Mh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 16:49:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48359) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cbDdK-0002fQ-Et for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 16:49:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cbDdG-0007FM-GQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 16:49:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:32915) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cbDdG-0007FG-CF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 16:49:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cbDdG-00049F-6V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 16:49:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Philipp Stephani Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 21:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25605 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 25605-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25605.148650408215871 (code B ref 25605); Tue, 07 Feb 2017 21:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25605) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2017 21:48:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59345 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cbDcI-00047u-Ec for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 16:48:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ot0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:34905) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cbDcG-00047M-Gn; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 16:48:01 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ot0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 65so97033067otq.2; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 13:48:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2YMAFsOvZo+3kEn4+akPUpninEGp7PVBl4Q2EoKM2w8=; b=IbordQDdOwGtpznsySCnJcImSBNqQxs0XODuDYcB4Lbj5fNq9Yzz1l63MY5t8qE4+a uZceG9EgfTjXHwsI0EqiWgXVAqycPjzyFi4wsAKh9Xb0KxeEGQxdko3x/3b+5E32KMyl NLzwxuGMqCsOFNl4DjCltKvrO55ZuidAd3MPZvcMsDrCBQr+2afaRhICOkwDjYYCU5rp dmUVE8a/lQtvNCLaH82Tn8Q6j0t06pq4t8Bw4ZEIL9bl7XnAEUQ9x5d5/4D4dVFZ0zio iGlTVvHpXNT23EfJ4ghgFrcAlWOOMW1PV5OyVjjqkiXS2Y8JCk2FQPjITMnL3+9Mfrlo 450g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2YMAFsOvZo+3kEn4+akPUpninEGp7PVBl4Q2EoKM2w8=; b=Y2qnBCjFTHxBSSZb6inSj9LSqOm2bfTPtyZsf4tu1eWVKG5UE2y9IyTnYBs6CxgGgu skgdCNmWFREYN84t4F+O/9BAy5GvQsEJJ78SMjfX6QCGA0DyCCwGRfz8rolG7k6ybyIB g8secjiRk9Z0U3s/nguMF5F0pglj20xe/rdwVZdYMo2q6h0+CjMXltsI5BqPgFdMU6+i w09gx6p1oou8wKdc90qufNANurGc4bfSBzLi6Zp07LOxGEWD7MdCHwaySb9Zs9LSJGuq 8MlLvI/39zz4GC+iuyZHmDVKnTXUK+CAlFTFTibPArvycO/VABSqab2M1GfvFdibv0bY oqyA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXL/BCYj9R+MEnrFuxhqs3G2oPBzNPBlFbJkKHbusHvKImt3iCLdnaA93h2tWUsuyiZBGtHO4GbvK6+1Dg== X-Received: by 10.157.16.27 with SMTP id h27mr8902639ote.120.1486504074820; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 13:47:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <42bf63df-416e-7623-8f59-862fbd55f2f3@cs.ucla.edu> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:129101 Archived-At: --001a113dffc05642d80547f7b3f6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Paul Eggert schrieb am Di., 7. Feb. 2017 um 17:32 Uhr: > On 02/07/2017 04:47 AM, Philipp Stephani wrote: > > If they fail, shouldn't the test runner that runs these tests time out > > after some time and mark them as failures? > > Not if the test runner is written in elisp. The loops are deep in the C > code and are immune to elisp timeouts. (I don't know how the test runner > works.) > > How about running the Emacs binary wrapped in /usr/bin/timeout? --001a113dffc05642d80547f7b3f6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Paul E= ggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> = schrieb am Di., 7. Feb. 2017 um 17:32=C2=A0Uhr:
On 02/07/2017 04:47 AM, Philipp Stephani wrote:
> If they fail, shouldn't the test runner that runs these tests time= out
> after some time and mark them as failures?

Not if the test runner is written in elisp. The loops are deep in the C
code and are immune to elisp timeouts. (I don't know how the test runne= r
works.)


How about running = the Emacs binary wrapped in /usr/bin/timeout?=C2=A0
--001a113dffc05642d80547f7b3f6--