Aurélien Aptel <aurelien.aptel+emacs@gmail.com> schrieb am Do., 3. Dez.
2015 um 12:33 Uhr:

> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:00 AM, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> wrote:
> > WIBNI we could define them as Lisp_Subr?
>
> (these initialisms are getting ridiculous)
>
> Yes we could try to do that, it's still an implementation detail as
> far as most module programmers are concerned.
>
>
It would suggest an interface change: defsubr also binds the function
object to a symbol. If we want make_function to use defsubr, it should
accept a symbol name parameter (which might be NULL, to undo the binding).