Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> schrieb am So., 6. März 2016 um 21:05 Uhr:

> > From: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2016 19:16:37 +0000
> > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, johnw@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> >
> > This is probably for practical purposes (no point in showing thousands
> of "CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-xyz"
> > completions). For a character escape these considerations don't apply,
> and it would be very surprising and
> > confusing to not accept all characters.
>
> The only characters that ucs-names omits are CJK ideographs, whose
> codepoints can be computed from the name algorithmically.  All the
> others are non-characters, right?  So why it won't be a good idea to
> simply use ucs-names?
>
>
I've attached another patch to switch to ucs-names.