From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Philipp Stephani
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Two fixes for module bug when interleaving threads
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 21:57:41 +0100
Message-ID:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
logging-data="34293"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
To: Emacs developers
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 27 21:58:37 2020
Return-path:
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.92)
(envelope-from )
id 1kikpB-0008pF-92
for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 21:58:37 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55226 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
(envelope-from )
id 1kikpA-00089I-Ba
for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 15:58:36 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47626)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from )
id 1kikoW-0007XO-0l
for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 15:57:56 -0500
Original-Received: from mail-oi1-x22b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::22b]:40455)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from )
id 1kikoU-0006MH-IT
for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 15:57:55 -0500
Original-Received: by mail-oi1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id a130so7166398oif.7
for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 12:57:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=zD7vDMGFw52hS4lq9VB+zbijWpUo5pYQ5WiJ/CRNM3I=;
b=vZle6BUGmGAVNJhM9Jza+o2Vk9+cFHCChuOt+8QglTSvu4HU3MvYDQtVFB4Cpy8OYK
deawDG2lNq3+MrDLKKGCCCL7/7KHfqXHaeAypGi9nH5pjfHHRTRY1dzCCStQOTSRHCvA
9dPkIDeskcwK0UrG73oGeW4i8OE0Z0dyWA/i/rF0N5u3pGe1nKKBeSaRqq2CINuQOApy
5vhI15T372BXo2eDEZ+Obf6bQbwSKdZn89TbMwdbBY5GRQHJ2EbnuQRQBwZaWQHNbkUE
jInEVrr+mRGkIvqUo4eO+1nwZAvv/hElVsQM1hyOgWIFywK3NtFNFOzbWaY6bGImOdwP
pyIw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=zD7vDMGFw52hS4lq9VB+zbijWpUo5pYQ5WiJ/CRNM3I=;
b=UvS3XZI2U56sxdem4GqFXCRLxlHUz93TxYuqpDqcvbkoGnDsBnl7favzN40BlQYJ7Z
tMzqWgodnM17brm4b12KAArl4ncHs5XFhtNAtVafqq8xxrQaBhHW90cB7jpiZTb+OYXL
Lp6gjFDynfwFG0wkFrbV3pkc3KqgQlZZT6Mzssbj9sHBtanS6RPUsDCE4UH3lGEehMXO
pjZSI3gm5pv4Mzc8YwUDVPBUkAQPBks2wXk9ySiprUD8B3XmeZdBv66CvZlINF4ouJKr
tLWwBqmiMpW7NhCHODOTc4YcZVczwf3aETyqAiSpWPhjx/nXKEZGJTo8GLtJsumiTJnu
Ehpw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532X0/Hx1RjQqFCQjV/CLiuGuRO86CdaLbTcGq/mEepEr9yqEXlI
/0ox8EphdfCcO1HEGNT3u2qqSbG06dUWkuBaplco4mjDLPk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxWZrSsOgvQQf4slaUIBghQF0aKJSsJ6ABPCJaoPc/N7WyPRitlzmJx46MtTczyHC3fdArsFOWa8D4E9oDsJ1I=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:3af:: with SMTP id
n15mr6752727oie.65.1606510673004;
Fri, 27 Nov 2020 12:57:53 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::22b;
envelope-from=p.stephani2@gmail.com; helo=mail-oi1-x22b.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -17
X-Spam_score: -1.8
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions."
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:259925
Archived-At:
Hi,
I just pushed two fixes for the same bug that appears when
interleaving module calls in separate threads:
cdc632fbe6e149318147a98cccf1b7af191f2ce8 for the release branch and
23974cfa48b9245658667eff81d132b3aecd2618 for master. The intention was
that a simpler and more localized fix should go to the release branch,
the "proper" fix to master. Now I've realized that arguably the
simpler fix is overall better: it's more localized, touches fewer
moving pieces, and is probably not significantly slower (though I
haven't benchmarked it). Any opinions? If people agree, we can
overwrite the fix on master with the fix on the release branch.
Thanks,
Philipp