From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Philipp Stephani
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Should mode commands be idempotent?
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 20:49:49 +0000
Message-ID:
References:
<9f11a3c6-b113-4bf6-9dab-f894b2ad77b5@default>
<55da155a-03b1-d3ed-4036-12e5a60fa26c@gmail.com>
<950166e7-2766-8a3e-1bc2-a93a356f652c@gmail.com>
<118feee3-5787-43b7-9c9b-06907a16a448@default>
<2564c62e-a419-45d8-809f-433a6f7c3808@default>
<44241233-0da3-4536-ab64-4071ecbfdac5@default>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114844d8e7c1880560dfd702"
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1513889349 26444 195.159.176.226 (21 Dec 2017 20:49:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 20:49:09 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 21 21:49:04 2017
Return-path:
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from )
id 1eS7m2-0006PQ-HV
for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 21:49:02 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40755 helo=lists.gnu.org)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from )
id 1eS7o1-00042l-0h
for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:51:05 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41919)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from ) id 1eS7mz-0003y1-Gj
for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:50:07 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from ) id 1eS7my-0004SG-MK
for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:50:01 -0500
Original-Received: from mail-qt0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22a]:34281)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from )
id 1eS7my-0004Ry-GE
for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:50:00 -0500
Original-Received: by mail-qt0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 33so34042714qtv.1
for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 12:50:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=MmTZDzZ5rD9npRIu9/W9D7jZLqkaMP/eQaZ4GnFagYQ=;
b=udlqO2VJEvNicXcPP5ttGXi6ePoF7O8qvEDkKQkOtfOucA4R7QA06/yltEHfIi4WAZ
oLfbLd6I8MHMBWTZhUPJKcIQDmRD202PML2FEGarkTZqHg4asnFofJnSrJG2C/RrJxFj
K1jFoDsZL1SSW92aEM3pyYE148r4LOyKoEDN6u5pPxAahTLEF7mk/ALy9ViZ8FXy5PSQ
j1XY+a/Fac4Lvx5vZ3AlU/k38aoLvHBhj/5oFzJp1ogMK+W6uaUbGrOunGrIfQMkAeZa
wOMcMkYlB9mezyeTszzDmxv+yXEnuSRS/nTsvUqZwln5Q0ZYzCXW8xQHA1QSlPj+luJ0
9yJQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=MmTZDzZ5rD9npRIu9/W9D7jZLqkaMP/eQaZ4GnFagYQ=;
b=NYkcxmTnklaIt5XfnxML8yM/+vVwT9z+ptKifpGfcNn93HxhBUbxp/Mk8TnZU/uWnW
Zm9ErVMZiOmJVr2KM3k4WDYIgvuJ3wyw3COJimZHFTJsbLbx3vciWV6oI/7vt5p5x7/w
YXZuMHsgb0EB7p59F8oVCh4zpSfJNgAg8C4vohY3Ym9k5JWZgWVSIXvn5ESpN5aCyd95
hRcSoFjDdkSPLNdWDoGXqXYDiHW52HnN05XoE+CIvZyEHZXIK0Q1SUpJqohId0onMAHU
9eIz7mlAV7ftSxFhY9ebw2yuWlvHg4plePJCgRFhAlYbmQXCJwSc+xWS2xsrwK7E/9OG
YOvg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKOP3lhek0lS45YysE4gzUbemO/0ZiFJHFWzeGMks0eO4ccV0cb
Os8/Xia6UURVzxvX5njiA1mRi6KB5JDEj43LN7w=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBoviIKHknvWr3L2sika4CgXI/9Ys0e9jn8ppkkK9uZuG6SO4fcmNNbzJC3iWRMpMAeimtfanR8kujEHiL8VHb3E=
X-Received: by 10.200.28.44 with SMTP id a41mr17768758qtk.340.1513889399815;
Thu, 21 Dec 2017 12:49:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not
recognized.
X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22a
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions."
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:221318
Archived-At:
--001a114844d8e7c1880560dfd702
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Stefan Monnier schrieb am So., 8. Okt. 2017 um
21:05 Uhr:
> > +@item
> > +Calling the major mode command twice in direct succession should not
> > +fail and should do the same thing as calling the command only once.
>
> I think I'd prefer it if the word "idempotent" was mentioned (not
> *instead* of what you have, but additionally).
>
> Other than that: LGTM.
>
>
Thanks, added and pushed to emacs-26 as 798f07f150.
--001a114844d8e7c1880560dfd702
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> +@item
> +Calling the major mode command twice in direct succession should not<=
br>
> +fail and should do the same thing as calling the command only once.
I think I'd prefer it if the word "idempotent" was mentioned =
(not
*instead* of what you have, but additionally).
Other than that: LGTM.
Thanks, added and pushed to emacs-26 a=
s 798f07f150.=C2=A0
--001a114844d8e7c1880560dfd702--