Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> schrieb am Mo., 21. Dez. 2015 um 20:00 Uhr:

> Cc: aurelien.aptel+emacs@gmail.com, p.stephani2@gmail.com, tzz@lifelogs.com,
> emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>
> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:28:09 -0800
>
> IMHO, we should treat OOM exactly like other sorts of error. It's
> dangerous to make some functions infallible.

We do: we signal an error.

For heap allocation failures, yes, but I think not for stack overflows. (And I think handling stack overflows is much harder, so I guess most people don't bother trying.)