From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philipp Stephani Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Removing some workarounds for big integers Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 21:10:35 +0200 Message-ID: References: <86d0uck5o0.fsf@gmail.com> <15786884-92c4-efb0-58d3-a6ec6726a0fe@cs.ucla.edu> <86lg02our6.fsf@gmail.com> <2cad6bf3-e0ef-eada-41d8-00d13ea814e4@cs.ucla.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30760"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Andy Moreton , Stefan Monnier , Emacs developers To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 13 21:17:05 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kSPnF-0007uB-PB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 21:17:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54294 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSPnE-00034N-My for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:17:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34102) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSPhB-00071D-WB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:10:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ot1-x32f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f]:36486) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSPhA-0006Js-By for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:10:49 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ot1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id 32so1104212otm.3 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:10:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=spHFZyMK3z7dsxu2829ojqq9O4+AjDn8UKgcjP+8RjU=; b=B6mR8PsWxACQdmytz02hsY6eIx5MCBRiKxfqt7KUmVSYttYRZjwkNA+zKxKhbs5YnM idLhtEQbMsrncXPP550BwA3X7gEG5v8dvluoHDFduKBzMpNCqOwm6xnerWqyWYB/9QLg hIW6TXb+sQHecT6Z9witSL3SmpqWqHioNNQqQCZe4DhaYKSVmBf5g7oZOckrzzZR0uNH Dp7KXk2v8axSJI8y7r1nzhYb8UVVo2UudmqLdelERKKKw7EIaJbaHtFylXJ3XAEIGBad QDu8+xusiBci3WjabSVXTgTkyrNl1rdvtv2Se/aMHdALwpLDg7oggzo0PwhJk2a3tdTJ 9UTQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=spHFZyMK3z7dsxu2829ojqq9O4+AjDn8UKgcjP+8RjU=; b=c2u62NRBiUh5ftl8X3IHqdQVIgcNcReUdxI+yBhDMVIJDTi7pubKTC1y2Fec5F+c1o mOTfDBIm0M9NlVKIPwabuokqbPsifxV+p26LSJSw4Bs83M4U11hzM9i6o8Dy+ewoySnZ kKMEKtpxvHXiexypu18K78FOeYcfrFJBiZrM2dUIHxRMhAOiraq/E9FEsN9l4Ka8wDv3 tr0Ix4sMw0KtMVQ/dAc/0w97u14TggzlFfsboAbi8yZwwlvR4u2EsFN9zomolKPlXZ04 1q5sfASZAQGhHQ1cdSKd9+cpVntepaYR694T/3OcrsJxEs2KvlDx3ThtiSw5A6C3fgj+ YchQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530UFoczEeFT3jjhGAlsIkcUCEjRVeSb04DNWXrTFlQdazKVEP7M aRlETF2o0vJCz7AEcCDfeXSPbMV0LwiP5K1ZEus= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyEMjcXDwcCqxU3HYFYCz8FUCDiBhwlE41i82vbxdyOOWFXyeAruN7ExgJFAbm73bQ3R2uJCWam7rZanbFDahg= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:831:: with SMTP id 46mr783524oty.149.1602616246593; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:10:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f; envelope-from=p.stephani2@gmail.com; helo=mail-ot1-x32f.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:257564 Archived-At: Am So., 9. Aug. 2020 um 19:26 Uhr schrieb Paul Eggert : > > On 8/9/20 10:04 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote: > >> Since we now require C11, that should always be available. > > We do? > > No, we require many (but not all) features of C99. We can use some C11 features > if available, but we don't require any of them. Fair enough. The current approach with explicit type specifications is then probably the best we can do for now.