From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Philipp Stephani
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Removing some workarounds for big integers
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 21:10:35 +0200
Message-ID:
References: <86d0uck5o0.fsf@gmail.com>
<15786884-92c4-efb0-58d3-a6ec6726a0fe@cs.ucla.edu>
<86lg02our6.fsf@gmail.com>
<2cad6bf3-e0ef-eada-41d8-00d13ea814e4@cs.ucla.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
logging-data="30760"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: Andy Moreton ,
Stefan Monnier ,
Emacs developers
To: Paul Eggert
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 13 21:17:05 2020
Return-path:
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.92)
(envelope-from )
id 1kSPnF-0007uB-PB
for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 21:17:05 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54294 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
(envelope-from )
id 1kSPnE-00034N-My
for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:17:04 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34102)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from )
id 1kSPhB-00071D-WB
for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:10:50 -0400
Original-Received: from mail-ot1-x32f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f]:36486)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from )
id 1kSPhA-0006Js-By
for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:10:49 -0400
Original-Received: by mail-ot1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id 32so1104212otm.3
for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=spHFZyMK3z7dsxu2829ojqq9O4+AjDn8UKgcjP+8RjU=;
b=B6mR8PsWxACQdmytz02hsY6eIx5MCBRiKxfqt7KUmVSYttYRZjwkNA+zKxKhbs5YnM
idLhtEQbMsrncXPP550BwA3X7gEG5v8dvluoHDFduKBzMpNCqOwm6xnerWqyWYB/9QLg
hIW6TXb+sQHecT6Z9witSL3SmpqWqHioNNQqQCZe4DhaYKSVmBf5g7oZOckrzzZR0uNH
Dp7KXk2v8axSJI8y7r1nzhYb8UVVo2UudmqLdelERKKKw7EIaJbaHtFylXJ3XAEIGBad
QDu8+xusiBci3WjabSVXTgTkyrNl1rdvtv2Se/aMHdALwpLDg7oggzo0PwhJk2a3tdTJ
9UTQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=spHFZyMK3z7dsxu2829ojqq9O4+AjDn8UKgcjP+8RjU=;
b=c2u62NRBiUh5ftl8X3IHqdQVIgcNcReUdxI+yBhDMVIJDTi7pubKTC1y2Fec5F+c1o
mOTfDBIm0M9NlVKIPwabuokqbPsifxV+p26LSJSw4Bs83M4U11hzM9i6o8Dy+ewoySnZ
kKMEKtpxvHXiexypu18K78FOeYcfrFJBiZrM2dUIHxRMhAOiraq/E9FEsN9l4Ka8wDv3
tr0Ix4sMw0KtMVQ/dAc/0w97u14TggzlFfsboAbi8yZwwlvR4u2EsFN9zomolKPlXZ04
1q5sfASZAQGhHQ1cdSKd9+cpVntepaYR694T/3OcrsJxEs2KvlDx3ThtiSw5A6C3fgj+
YchQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530UFoczEeFT3jjhGAlsIkcUCEjRVeSb04DNWXrTFlQdazKVEP7M
aRlETF2o0vJCz7AEcCDfeXSPbMV0LwiP5K1ZEus=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyEMjcXDwcCqxU3HYFYCz8FUCDiBhwlE41i82vbxdyOOWFXyeAruN7ExgJFAbm73bQ3R2uJCWam7rZanbFDahg=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:831:: with SMTP id 46mr783524oty.149.1602616246593;
Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f;
envelope-from=p.stephani2@gmail.com; helo=mail-ot1-x32f.google.com
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache.
That's all we know.
X-Spam_score_int: -17
X-Spam_score: -1.8
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions."
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:257564
Archived-At:
Am So., 9. Aug. 2020 um 19:26 Uhr schrieb Paul Eggert :
>
> On 8/9/20 10:04 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> Since we now require C11, that should always be available.
> > We do?
>
> No, we require many (but not all) features of C99. We can use some C11 features
> if available, but we don't require any of them.
Fair enough. The current approach with explicit type specifications is
then probably the best we can do for now.