Stefan Monnier schrieb am Sa., 8. Apr. 2017 um 19:58 Uhr: > > It's not trying hard, just a simple check for a known, small, and > > rarely-changing list of primitive symbols. > > To me, that's working very hard: > - extra code. > Only a tiny bit. > - extra maintenance > Negligible, because we rarely add new primitive types. A comment should be added to Ftype_of to also modify a static list of primitive types when adding a new type, but that should be it. > - extra run-time checks. > Minor concern. Emacs Lisp isn't C; we prefer to help the user over saving a couple of clock cycles. > - no benefit since this doesn't catch a common situation. > Catching uncommon situation is precisely the point of precondition checking.