>>>>> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
> I've tried to review the discussion so far and believe the code is
> "functional enough." I think we got agreement from Stefan (probably John
> too) to exempt dynamic modules from the feature freeze.
If Eli and Stefan agree,
Stefan disagreed with (a) error handling (longjmp vs. local return) and (b) local object allocation (direct cast vs. a simple local allocator).
you have my go ahead to integrate the code.
Would you prefer this as one big patch, or as several smaller ones? A big patch would make it easier to see the code in context, but splitting it up might increase review speed.