From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philipp Stephani Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Undefined behavior in OS X unexec detected by ASan Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 19:36:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83k2k8jyix.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a7f14b7f2d20532e6a120 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1463341043 29738 80.91.229.3 (15 May 2016 19:37:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 19:37:23 +0000 (UTC) To: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 15 21:37:18 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b21qf-00031O-0C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 May 2016 21:37:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41222 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b21qe-0004Ao-95 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 May 2016 15:37:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35317) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b21qa-000472-OB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 May 2016 15:37:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b21qY-0005lR-MZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 May 2016 15:37:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::231]:33597) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b21qX-0005lG-Sm; Sun, 15 May 2016 15:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lb0-x231.google.com with SMTP id jj5so43933001lbc.0; Sun, 15 May 2016 12:37:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NpSTb7SqNe1aLvpskLMD9jtSypPW7h5ZnRTpGBx+DBw=; b=K5EOakyMNiJlCX34Ah991bb90QdImuPD+ujE9hb//d12M1JdRogITSJBpp+VAbX8Z/ 3hPqIKXzLxUOUZZb2LTeQPYvHwT+rYL2114AJp4+GLlap4ATNSberl0FeuKGWNi5K6HF NewiaH7oh2l+XzV0qiAhbU4NGAaHZVq7C3dUxhgeCF7Zh5VnuYANVW3Zl85NFSBpKP9m rg7Z2xTataE8yXK4zJKUwWxEhKDKPGB6KcOJQP7SwfrXMpaxmIienNaSBnQm+jzgLn2/ 2XtFyBNyiA9HJqdRKmxSRLoVfBl047lqkhw4hXxj4LXyMd4+Q12kM8obJ9YilSb01vPP 9JbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=NpSTb7SqNe1aLvpskLMD9jtSypPW7h5ZnRTpGBx+DBw=; b=j1PSnt5gRuqoAdAdbX5iayNMsFJw+L0340IkYAjmINVzyoXALfkHtJrUnSb2qqZgQ9 dtaCd7iABEpWjiYFpjtjAtNqSmrYpqvCNxJ8mZf+AyHaQBDLawCEOC6RLZ5pVRZ3zFkU LkUF0Fl9W38FjyizDYxeY8AR/FaNz6FfeSwPkq/Aa8mIaoh9DogLgA42sa999f+tLfnP 5T5a2fShUK9eqdZbLt5loZwUNryePqmfURGcP2O9est+KpyW5y47K6lj1ECQUzQtDgUV 05fOASMt+q5XuzsiPbcL076Qb1C+/dN4pTjpmo0onORV0MkK4GmDSJ2RRUWp3HRvhpip z9Pw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXSNcXGcSJuaw2Drh+Ub9QVfTLSW7WKMSFF5GKB2PplaLBIonJ3yaTvXxIkkxnlRLMVIA5X+GG/+8fWAw== X-Received: by 10.112.129.129 with SMTP id nw1mr10791410lbb.23.1463341020603; Sun, 15 May 2016 12:37:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::231 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203847 Archived-At: --047d7b3a7f14b7f2d20532e6a120 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 John Wiegley schrieb am Fr., 8. Apr. 2016 um 18:02 Uhr: > >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Would someone who uses OS X please see if this patch is OK? Are there any > > version-related caveats here (e.g., could some older OS X version have > > trouble with this change)? > > > If everything's fine with the patch, we still need to decide to which > branch > > this should go. John? > > I'll give it a try. If it still looks good next week, then I think emacs-25 > would be fine, since this isn't new behavior but just a correction. > > Friendly ping? --047d7b3a7f14b7f2d20532e6a120 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


John W= iegley <jwiegley@gmail.com>= schrieb am Fr., 8. Apr. 2016 um 18:02=C2=A0Uhr:
>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> Would someone who uses OS X please see if this patch is OK? Are there = any
> version-related caveats here (e.g., could some older OS X version have=
> trouble with this change)?

> If everything's fine with the patch, we still need to decide to wh= ich branch
> this should go. John?

I'll give it a try. If it still looks good next week, then I think emac= s-25
would be fine, since this isn't new behavior but just a correction.


Friendly ping?=C2=A0
--047d7b3a7f14b7f2d20532e6a120--