From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 2b316c0: ; * CONTRIBUTE: Add section about the bug tracker Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 10:33:48 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20151106085750.28172.54745@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113eb0462a890c0523dbf3f6 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1446802486 9943 80.91.229.3 (6 Nov 2015 09:34:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 09:34:46 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs developers , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 06 10:34:46 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZudPx-0001Iv-5B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:34:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37576 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZudPw-0007om-GX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 04:34:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45068) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZudPj-0007of-HM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 04:34:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZudPi-0006bz-FU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 04:34:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::232]:36596) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZudPg-0006bX-Of; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 04:34:28 -0500 Original-Received: by lfs39 with SMTP id 39so39469795lfs.3; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 01:34:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=PDl9I+awjf4YYTKb4GB4igJao0RyghPs/fXSbO30uLg=; b=zpCSNG/pDl/KOd90eVeD5iZtmKhah7fc0hNBtqR1KiWaT16PDcKUb4KnjxDVBWHhbF fhCSYgIkRyOtN0P895OCbyCfJVubs0ALJFFvzAaONtUBmjtgmR0osqFMm2vJRp1GBz3/ Q7fPZrvABPHugzmWKFEqVux66PU/9maQG3jMzIclzmYtYYStIVsv6nGMo/riRzejgqjR bjnTnwcywcEb2xbkWHydtOgxGOc/G8qJ8x9+TBV3JYNevMN9ALcBBcko+wlJZF+n9jf+ Z9zvratvVMNZHI66gKcn+PfMmxYqogzt9QLuruz/eNDA/RRK/Fll4SmXFdXTN9xVtu+v 0bQQ== X-Received: by 10.25.10.216 with SMTP id 207mr3772195lfk.80.1446802468012; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 01:34:28 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.25.217.132 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 01:33:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::232 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193380 Archived-At: --001a113eb0462a890c0523dbf3f6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > -See all the files in admin/notes/* . In particular, see > -admin/notes/newfile, see admin/notes/repo. Speaking of admin/notes/repo... It has a few obsolete references to Bazaar, and a comment "[The section on git merge procedure has not yet been written.]" And I miss some discussion about policies on pushing branches to the repo. old-branches/* and other-branches/* are ancient, but what about the others? Some are prefixed with scratch/ or fix/ (one case), while others are not (like nsm, stream or shr-fontified). Is there any rhyme or reason? Also, perhaps some of the non-prefixed branches are really ancient, like pending, and should be renamed? J --001a113eb0462a890c0523dbf3f6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> -See = all the files in admin/notes/* .=C2=A0 In particular, see
> -admin/no= tes/newfile, see admin/notes/repo.

Speaking of admin/note= s/repo... It has a few obsolete references to Bazaar, and a comment "[= The section on git merge procedure has not yet been written.]"

And I miss some discussion about policies on pushing bran= ches to the repo. old-branches/* and other-branches/* are ancient, but what= about the others? Some are prefixed with scratch/ or fix/ (one case), whil= e others are not (like nsm, stream or shr-fontified). Is there any rhyme or= reason? Also, perhaps some of the non-prefixed branches are really ancient= , like pending, and should be renamed?

=C2=A0 =C2= =A0 J
--001a113eb0462a890c0523dbf3f6--