From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16696: Fwd: frameset-to-register: Different from frame-configuration-to-register? Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:07:52 +0100 Message-ID: References: <21238.34299.271423.45527@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87ha88aqsy.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391987352 8674 80.91.229.3 (9 Feb 2014 23:09:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 23:09:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: raman To: 16696@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 10 00:09:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WCdUy-00006Y-2i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:09:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52426 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCdUx-0005RW-Jw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 18:09:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36233) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCdUp-0005RI-A7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 18:09:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCdUk-0007um-Hq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 18:09:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46950) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCdUk-0007ui-Ds for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 18:09:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCdUk-0006Be-1m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 18:09:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 23:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16696 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 16696-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16696.139198731623740 (code B ref 16696); Sun, 09 Feb 2014 23:09:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16696) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2014 23:08:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60966 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCdUJ-0006Ao-Qw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 18:08:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yk0-f175.google.com ([209.85.160.175]:56262) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCdUH-0006Ad-4N for 16696@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 18:08:33 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-yk0-f175.google.com with SMTP id 131so5179732ykp.6 for <16696@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 15:08:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=AklXiLyvgKippi5v58pNAT8A3qELhkDxa2icUzvUpI8=; b=kFKq2Afsl4fb612YNHUzE3JugQ76/cDaDEhK7pmHYMEUpXVUiceAXYjWLUCGv24LIQ bN6nefb5S5HiRsgDqKfwqVurVv2HXSM37iigDIVDZVELyym+ep2b30CqnHYIOwJFE+Fx P9DbgYR+qjuEdHl0/bKTCZH/gLw8VCitq2GTbX0zrF0OAzR244hJHUDchD/XpwU2Expx yS1jXtjCVXG+M562en/fXyqBUabgNQAgH9SQefFvZLAuMr8mqJnOWCOEl8zbCYq+ggn4 hIDLwOcQ3hDtGkbD6gofo5d+THIHMU8hxyUahQCGdGS2e4LK0LMhX9AIBTfmsUYV7sZ4 nplQ== X-Received: by 10.236.128.97 with SMTP id e61mr13453714yhi.43.1391987312533; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 15:08:32 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.170.84.65 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 15:07:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ha88aqsy.fsf@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85105 Archived-At: Following your recipe, I do not see the same error that you reported. I get a message "Marker points into wrong buffer: #", but the frame is restored. I'll have to look into it. As for making a bug report, it already exists and it's bug#16696 (I'm forwarding this message to that bug thread). Please answer any followup comment there and not to emacs-devel. Thanks, Juanma ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: raman Date: Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 11:01 PM Subject: Re: frameset-to-register: Different from frame-configuration-to-register? To: emacs.devel@gnu.org To repro, make sure you switch buffers etc after invoking C-x rf so the config you jump to with C-x rj is different from your current setup. So repro steps: 1. M-x calendar 2. C-x4b *scratch* 3. C-xrf a 4. M-x shell 5. C-x 1 6. C-xrj a Re filing a detailed bug report, I've stayed away because I was afraid I'd not be able to do that from the comfort of Emacs --