From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gnutls for lose32 Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 14:28:43 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87aa68dfao.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4F0154F1.6000002@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325510994 12409 80.91.229.12 (2 Jan 2012 13:29:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 13:29:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Paul Eggert , rms@gnu.org, nmav@gnutls.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Carsten Mattner Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 02 14:29:38 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RhhxE-0001kt-AM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 14:29:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45391 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhhxD-0004Fg-Ql for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 08:29:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53923) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhhxB-0004FP-4b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 08:29:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhhxA-0008Ke-7X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 08:29:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pz0-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41]:40838) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rhhx7-0008K5-GX; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 08:29:25 -0500 Original-Received: by dakl33 with SMTP id l33so12616093dak.0 for ; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 05:29:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3ZVIzIyGbquZ+GQWUX0+P8jiPVPzP9v+wLaqTTYgMxI=; b=NgokW2PbxC+83dcEProPtPdM/KNgNx1iTXeJglI14dmPa8OOfMQw3qan5b4oHXDzXL JwXPSqVg8QxzncqPkCQRGK3GorFzxA2XcICcVMHnchjdlsiIhtdZN8XiY34jI8uXX9ID 6Lvs/+aDdGkCujkA8i/9IKFpLblITsdmyoir0= Original-Received: by 10.68.191.6 with SMTP id gu6mr91295757pbc.91.1325510964171; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 05:29:24 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.142.247.28 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 05:28:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.210.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147176 Archived-At: On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 14:09, Carsten Mattner wrote: > Is the intent to hide or deny the existence of Windows? And do not forget all the references to "MS-DOG", which I personally find both infantile and a bit insulting. If denying any supposed positive inference in "win32" merits such effort, fighting the negative connotations of that particular idiomatic use of "dog" would be even worthier, as dogs are quite wonderful creatures (recent archaeological findings have pushed the estimated domestication of wolves into dogs back from 12,000 to 30,000+ years, so we've been friends time enough to start showing them some respect...). =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma (Sorry: I cooperate with a rescue org specializing in saving Spanish Greyhounds, which quite likely are the most abused breed in the world, and see dogs disrespected and brutalized almost daily. I'm touchy in all things dog.)