From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Git mirrors Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 03:42:50 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8762k095n4.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871uuksdxi.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lissh32y.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87zkh8e286.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1318297420 9163 80.91.229.12 (11 Oct 2011 01:43:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 11 03:43:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDRNY-0007nt-Oo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 03:43:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34991 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDRNY-0000BX-48 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:43:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57157) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDRNV-0000BH-Fk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:43:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDRNU-0008Pw-MK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:43:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.213.41]:59814) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDRNT-0008Pf-A8; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:43:31 -0400 Original-Received: by ywe9 with SMTP id 9so7167531ywe.0 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:43:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YRZZuwKRncu832m04isCBrP+yQzx9dHhNL1HO+W8K4A=; b=m8iyPAzaawyRdlaxNBSsVtQyFZ3A5EShBkZ5BaX3mJ9h64sEhq6QnFCJLm7snjauaM Pp7Xkqi7CNqR7ksjET/IewngViZE5I4TtkD8nAH55CRjsthoc7YccSh67zjsUQIPj9fk QqLbMQzgHtJhwAxq8LUxBm/lxCHDRsmQx2JN0= Original-Received: by 10.68.10.70 with SMTP id g6mr41136496pbb.65.1318297410071; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:43:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.142.194.3 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:42:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zkh8e286.fsf@catnip.gol.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.213.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:144845 Archived-At: On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 03:39, Miles Bader wrote: > Juanma Barranquero writes: >>> promoting a technically inferior package (i.e. bzr) >> >> git's supposed technical advantage over bzr is a matter of discussion. > > Perhaps, but that's not actually so important. =C2=A0It's clear that git = is > technically very good, that it's seen much wider adoption than any of > its competitors, and that it has the bulk of the mindshare in the > "distributed source control" arena. Perhaps, but I'm specifically countering =C3=93scar's affirmation that bzr is a "technically inferior package". Sociopolitics of git usage is an interesting topic for another list, IMO. > Tsk, tsk, now _that's_ flamebait... Not at all. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma