On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 2:51 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > The last sentence should be the 2nd, because you mention WINDOW in the > first sentence of the doc string. Ok. > Are these comments really no longer relevant? They are relevant for the obsolete code, but they are misleading because they describe an implementation that's no longer used. I don't think we want to spend time fixing these functions, or any bugs in them, and we don't want to encourage *more* unbundled packages or user code using these functions. It's better to strip the comment, put a notice, and let it be until we feel it's safe to just remove it all.