From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9653: 24.0.50; `ucs-names' - Why all of the ("" . XXX) entries? Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:47:12 +0200 Message-ID: References: <74B14D2A03144E798C9415172D5FE01A@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317908951 22573 80.91.229.12 (6 Oct 2011 13:49:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 13:49:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Kevin Rodgers , 9653@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 06 15:49:04 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBoJq-0002Pl-4j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:49:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32913 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBoJo-00079u-Pb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 09:49:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60949) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBoJl-00079m-Rk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 09:48:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBoJh-0000mU-Pa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 09:48:57 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46160) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBoJh-0000mQ-Mi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 09:48:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBoJq-0000fb-5r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 09:49:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9653 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9653-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9653.13179088892510 (code B ref 9653); Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9653) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2011 13:48:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBoIy-0000eR-DE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 09:48:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBoIw-0000dv-Um for 9653@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 09:48:07 -0400 Original-Received: by vcbfo11 with SMTP id fo11so2261049vcb.3 for <9653@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 06:47:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uxZXmU5dzH4VHo8nax/+mKYkT+zuOq/Oh0gicfLX5xw=; b=aeGUeo/2Blyfxk3IU9Y7Lf0iz0p/vgIwUjXbbsQn7xRGz/ppAfb7fXxAGCagVGPF3G 71LLNNhItZd8Wegg3y6UXRQhhrtCw7h+jFRfSumhATePVAVhgS32q/OqVEEDh8knE+r3 DbchUhVlfZt+Psi0jUmiIubSe2CfEhfPLXLVE= Original-Received: by 10.68.60.166 with SMTP id i6mr5962123pbr.48.1317908872066; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 06:47:52 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.142.223.13 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 06:47:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 09:49:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52276 Archived-At: On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 15:02, Andreas Schwab wrote: > (or x "") is much more lispy There's nothing unlispy in the other code. Sometimes simplicity can be attained, and sometimes the answer is more complex. > and does not require repeating a value. Yes. let-bindings exist for a reason. But the point is, it seems probable that the "" interface is more according to what a get-char-code-property user would expect. At least, it's what I would expect. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma