From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default for the envelope From in smtpmail.el Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 21:40:06 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83fwmkps09.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309903031 5535 80.91.229.12 (5 Jul 2011 21:57:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 21:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 05 23:57:07 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QeDcA-00044h-U1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 23:57:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37160 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QeDcA-00015C-5L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 17:57:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50527) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QeBUN-0006Xw-J1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 15:40:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QeBUL-0005z9-Vf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 15:40:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pv0-f169.google.com ([74.125.83.169]:49905) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QeBUF-0005wE-PH; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 15:40:47 -0400 Original-Received: by pvc12 with SMTP id 12so7107972pvc.0 for ; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:40:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xg/KQvdLEQFL0TsPMvDC/750rCjz5I6GiOL+SoDzQhs=; b=akpYrEdn8ohhL7PYrT7lG0+Spgi1+PezLRMN4oYFH7nAe5Z+5RbJQyD0CrwZ5MQf/a b6EcVUpjWUN7mE0/TkiNv0PpIn9FeXV68MQ8KRBhdVYw3aPg/rq8hhIafy4ASAPodGEV PhikdBC4TJhZxmhcqVh7iG+kBYxz01AiBmaSU= Original-Received: by 10.143.91.16 with SMTP id t16mr3403280wfl.366.1309894846233; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:40:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.142.144.4 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 12:40:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83fwmkps09.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 74.125.83.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141614 Archived-At: On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 19:16, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > We are just a couple of weeks from > the pretest -- do we really want to make Emacs as unstable as humanly > possible till then? Yes, of course. As a challenge. Then we can try to beat the 333 days between 21.0.90 and 21.1. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma