From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Freezing frameset-restore Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 19:35:37 +0100 Message-ID: References: <5318AFF6.8020206@gmx.at> <5318BB8E.1010901@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1394130974 32546 80.91.229.3 (6 Mar 2014 18:36:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 18:36:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 06 19:36:24 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WLd9a-0004zI-TE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 19:36:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59208 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLd9a-0002St-DN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:36:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42130) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLd9X-0002So-DO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:36:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLd9W-0008Qa-GH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:36:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yk0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22a]:41014) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLd9W-0008QR-Cj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:36:18 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-yk0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 9so7698580ykp.1 for ; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:36:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=Pk2JQEBEg4axtyjEE/0D3jVn3gFqq9XXBKcJakIdH+s=; b=Hnog4hbkDfq33SRSV91KW/QJDGC4THP1V35vWRXq4nNwq7dAlzHORQcSBqzEaFRWth 5mfgt85IXnrIAr7jIqCJYcZ2FDtg2Kvg8IWJrbbJPYongBqM+Nf0SU8FMhHLYrmqJYyI LkbbypuapH8EV0hololXvawChJS2H+0EaLyvX3zJ50xpZ+vWw8kys+rS1Vwxl/6D3C4A 03KnvLzbrLvbfugxigAYWBwelAvTRWIQI8L64JOCQH+e+FfGjmNuCvk6TqMTmbvXLCka XuJ1PL3CJEeVh+xIMetn4qZ1y+qHu837gnl/yLbZchpC5ffMWG8KqTQMeMnK1fE6HQ1O leEw== X-Received: by 10.236.149.2 with SMTP id w2mr3770688yhj.114.1394130977838; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:36:17 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.170.163.3 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 10:35:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5318BB8E.1010901@gmx.at> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170185 Archived-At: On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 7:16 PM, martin rudalics wrote: > But IIUC you mean here a frame that existed > in the current session or configuration just before you started to > restore frames and you were not able to use profitably. Yes. After restoration, there's a set of frames (old and/or new) which correspond to what was in the frameset. And another, possibly empty, set of pre-existing frames that do not correspond to the frameset, they are remnants of the pre-restoration configuration. In some cases they are kept (C-x r j R), in some cases they are deleted (C-u C-x r j R). > At least use "restored upon" instead. I'll do that. > Then CLEANUP is too narrow. Maybe something like POST-RESTORE (which > clearly isn't a good term either) to emphasize that it does _not only_ > deal with frames that were rejected or ignored. Well, the term CLEANUP was meant to refer to cleaning up the whole frame configuration afterwards. But I don't mind at all changing the argument name, if someone can come up with an alternative less ugly than POST-RESTORE. Thanks for your comments, BTW. J