From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: jit-lock-antiblink-grace Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 16:50:09 +0200 Message-ID: References: <834l0enw8c.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006c4c270594b7c268" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="30703"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 12 16:51:21 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iJIjp-0007rZ-15 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 16:51:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34052 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iJIjn-00086S-FX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 10:51:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47326) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iJIjI-000867-Pi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 10:50:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJIjH-0000le-Ru for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 10:50:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt1-x842.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::842]:41380) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJIjG-0000jj-8b; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 10:50:46 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt1-x842.google.com with SMTP id v52so18333968qtb.8; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 07:50:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BJiyL1JwslUCtKu7Mgw0a+WaChoaKzPBdpfM54Stn/k=; b=qhRN91zJJu5XhlWadVP+8E7AAQFDWZMOOKNt+PBa3aFU59Wsm+nahpBER953yIcSYE 51jwvx32DeN+jLsfAUFtPc+uPOhzewEVFNfKbrqlCnHW8w8ZOlEWMGuhzbozCboBcije 9GcN6Bl2wsZ16MdiU12KW4ZtSlFYtd+RiohqPq8DKui8dF+ZbmNpYsx2Ck17lNDnes34 Th9UkIS4zHmRS86nBusSRa4xuueaKoZfzKpAuV1MRPgvb4t73fYT7lmPiqLuugvOVuTu 25Qrv9p6AqTRu0p0b3L3uXNayrGoXigAPi6btIxmWidb4HkVhF9LntszSrXuL48Z7AK2 WSrQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BJiyL1JwslUCtKu7Mgw0a+WaChoaKzPBdpfM54Stn/k=; b=PuZtpC7e1WxeqPu/K8hVpoyJpexOzf8z4mHaRSB4H/d+1xQ93ydXPRDLXU1KcHFKKT 7kcB4Hh97KfcYBXQoVz7U19NJINF3R8pRxdOJxL/53autM6cB6bxiYqjAmNPkfwr5gyL UrGhmrTUjll9ALOvniBF1xk0wV6l/eP4n/dNBawInWkZm83GS3hKyn+OrMEeVKGS2qRO /SGWyHS4JX8vbIoALzOF7TkQsXRC01hJEuRXuImHbk5Wdw99BTkpK4kRazSTwyGWKKpW C1ecr114oXyuJahDwtdrkRCCVC4e5Jweq69ef4QnHS+Qd40laqZoxnzDrk8f8uvg5vwM 7CLA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV2URPOA6Vesy91Efu0HafzSRMQpLRqhM+vT1koismiuwFOvXlJ 1/1j/8EoBekO0gkvwM5n9ag458DgqXEn8kWK4kg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzxoWwONbWWkizapp4gEJP6892p+uYo5X3w2cjCv8yrF14vuPZSAvPnmhMNcnKyB0Ql5OSiafF4o59Jm3GAqSs= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5345:: with SMTP id v5mr22050618qvs.217.1570891845355; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 07:50:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::842 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:240921 Archived-At: --0000000000006c4c270594b7c268 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 3:14 PM Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora wrote: > I don't understand how this can be an argument. It wasn't an argument, it was a light-hearted comment. > Is not exceeding the length of the longest symbol > ever, i.e. playing to the 99% percentile, acceptable > criteria for readability? I don't think so, personally. Well, me, I prefer longer names to cryptic ones. --0000000000006c4c270594b7c268 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 3:1= 4 PM Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora <joao= tavora@gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't understand how= this can be an argument.

It wasn't an argumen= t, it was a light-hearted comment.

> Is not exceeding the = length of the longest symbol
> ever, i.e. playing to the 99% percenti= le, acceptable
> criteria for readability? I don't think so, pers= onally.

Well, me, I prefer longer names to cryptic ones.<= /div>

--0000000000006c4c270594b7c268--