From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17046: 24.3.50; On startup emacs frame has no minibuffer or windows decorations Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 22:52:32 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87bnx1me40.fsf@capuchin.co.uk> <532DAA47.5020101@gmx.at> <532DAD2D.9050508@gmx.at> <21293.47677.273344.433965@capuchin.co.uk> <532DD9C8.2090209@gmx.at> <532DE5C8.3070308@gmx.at> <21293.61407.237813.539443@capuchin.co.uk> <532E022A.1010401@gmx.at> <21294.2992.133359.234317@capuchin.co.uk> <532EB366.8070801@gmx.at> <21294.49676.124258.183227@capuchin.co.uk> <532EC7F7.2060307@gmx.at> <21294.58410.934138.908538@capuchin.co.uk> <532EE6F9.50003@gmx.at> <21294.61472.376055.235383@capuchin.co.uk> <532EF5F3.5040706@gmx.at> <21294.64295.631988.273738@capuchin.co.uk> <532EFDB1.9020902@gmx.at> <21295.1905.505188.563594@capuchin.co.uk> <532F10C7.6030801@gmx.at> <21295.5581.394024.241655@capuchin.co.uk> <532F19C0.4020902@gmx.at> <21295.7482.513409.93351@capuchin.co.uk> <21295.14057.185786.863083@capuchin.co.uk> <21295.21403.534064.434296@capuchin.co.uk> <21295.59468.82731.2394@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.7931.103056.823206@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.12737.48072.487144@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.19864.25566.342047@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.22701.448897.930196@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.26536.10078.165484@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.32260.291274.364373@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.42153.768572.7270@capuchin.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395698050 17483 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2014 21:54:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:54:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17046@debbugs.gnu.org To: Robert Marshall Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 24 22:54:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WSCoy-00048r-Eu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 22:54:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38505 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSCoy-0004e1-55 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:54:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56062) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSCoq-0004dt-Un for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:54:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSCol-00035z-RO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:54:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSCol-00035v-Ml for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:54:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WSCok-0003Pr-P3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:54:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17046 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17046-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17046.139569799712987 (code B ref 17046); Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17046) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Mar 2014 21:53:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48113 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WSCo0-0003NO-IH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:53:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yk0-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:39175) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WSCnx-0003ND-5w for 17046@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:53:13 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yk0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 142so16343568ykq.0 for <17046@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:53:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=MPQKUxPBJ+9pqJBAzcdrCiNUdMv4SvNOi0uURbnWs+A=; b=saXJE1neNiJFHjJX1sJ0WzJTVsusXD5TZ6XxCoQ87AICue9qQOkn5YDaugkWDAyEDA EFX12iQegl3P41ZiTnCApCV0GWh1cIJIfRCtJWoM/uT8CTYneM6qmy86sJzPyv8pPJAQ O+FQj7Ed7rOd1kkF2RBXJXglOSU3CCfUJikjAreDU4jN76tQcsebjd0V1qnHPaT699rr anEZ2ok5dVcK6T+yOFr9avA8+el94OYsMPQBz5z45ooVYleRUBpMV8GKQxp1diC28Qpd C8fit9SM7G0ZpNue3KC7MwVMdAnduzZ93j5PBAw8kmDXGWTg0MYluVc7x369lY53HLlT OGFQ== X-Received: by 10.236.149.2 with SMTP id w2mr5283057yhj.114.1395697992395; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:53:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.170.163.3 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:52:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <21296.42153.768572.7270@capuchin.co.uk> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:87333 Archived-At: On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Robert Marshall wrote: > So there were, that's one error each ;-) Yep ;-) > I've done all 4 runs and none of them produced the bug! I assume this > isn't what you expected I half-expected it. > I see some of the parameters to > frameset-restore are different. Not just that, I've radically simplified `frameset--restore-frame'. So if you do not see now the bug even with (display . ":0"), that means that we can forget for now the other parameters and concentrate on testing only display yes/no again. Before I change anything more, if you happen to still have a bug*.el file from previous tests where you were able to reproduce the bug, try it using (frameset-restore desktop-saved-frameset :reuse-frames t :force-display nil :force-onscreen nil :cleanup-frames t) to call frameset-restore. I expect that you will still see the bug, but if you don't, that will be interesting by itself. J