From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16772: Failure in "make install" on MS-Windows Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:32:54 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392640451 15850 80.91.229.3 (17 Feb 2014 12:34:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16772@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 17 13:34:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WFNOr-0004Lj-J4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:34:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39713 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFNOr-00062V-7l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 07:34:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38424) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFNOi-00062D-64 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 07:34:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFNOc-0003DM-6f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 07:34:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54814) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFNOc-0003DH-3W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 07:34:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFNOb-0001iK-Qw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 07:34:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16772 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16772-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16772.13926404236561 (code B ref 16772); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16772) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Feb 2014 12:33:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55996 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFNOI-0001hi-U0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 07:33:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ea0-f182.google.com ([209.85.215.182]:62572) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFNOG-0001hQ-9M for 16772@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 07:33:40 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ea0-f182.google.com with SMTP id r15so7113775ead.41 for <16772@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 04:33:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=Bz7jh8pb46LnVY3jc5yLt3nGrFI/MHMjqxMkK56xa50=; b=iI41r77o7n6A/ZD3078brUpiWRwLfWo09GUqrVBl07KoQR1OJKgi1emAPp9MjK8c5F tDeoXTHuu34wNiNfkKvp0B2jYPQQ3yrx7+i+a22Vt7EbYVG8yH5iLmry/lErWibC1FPk uh/JUBvoPgIFfWkoBJpDq/Da1xCCzJc+TwOIxCP5mMy2oGBDwpaLEA5YMEREO4uYIwUf xa6MCVsrJhTJiy0iP7Xac1+3TBfjg1aWplMhW16XXUjLm0AYleoTA8klRB+Ba6QHNVPW J7cTjjc5FotnCyjeQf7IR5KNUSZpgt73VLen+H/HY8qTE/0eODVjb5zzL42U/YHCxzfW K9kQ== X-Received: by 10.15.22.65 with SMTP id e41mr27049305eeu.5.1392640414264; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 04:33:34 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.14.128.133 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 04:32:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85723 Archived-At: On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Dani Moncayo wrote: > ISTR some maintainer (Glenn?) saying that people should not file bug > reports about obvious build failures, because they are likely to be > noticed and fixed soon. That would be an argument for not reporting them anywhere, not the bug tracker, not emacs-devel. But anyway, not many people builds on Windows, so build failures can go unnoticed. I certainly built & installed (and bootstrapped & installed) before commiting the change, but my builds are all in-place and I missed this bug. So, yes, for Windows building failures I'd recommend filing bug reports. J