From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Any idea why "make V=1" isn't working for me? Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 03:50:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83612ft8bs.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2qvrnb1.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9lysyi9.fsf@gnu.org> <83bnc6sthp.fsf@gnu.org> <837fmussjg.fsf@gnu.org> <834mhyspq9.fsf@gnu.org> <83fv1hqwf6.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3c47c9337f20521de90fe X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444614694 24578 80.91.229.3 (12 Oct 2015 01:51:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 01:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 12 03:51:33 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZlSGz-0008KX-Ec for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 03:51:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52121 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZlSGy-0000z0-Ir for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 21:51:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45803) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZlSGl-0000yu-Kw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 21:51:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZlSGk-0003SV-Oz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 21:51:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::230]:33484) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZlSGi-0003S2-QF; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 21:51:16 -0400 Original-Received: by lbbk10 with SMTP id k10so16580519lbb.0; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 18:51:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=qLtHrW0Y+jENaNV8QUTZjgEpSBMALli3Xm5+mA2sFBA=; b=Q4ujZedesVShpKmMwGFeCRA6IO3fJVfpaey/NdO9e7AUIRM/4nqqQXaW+BXd6T52j6 lLdkBdMl7A9hdkx4AuR9wIfXrfc8CN1f2EoMJ7UVj1MPA2sk4efpymlmxpFaS/exv3/p yTHYhFsBKQgj3AodTDT/cvCfP7/xHSg5V/tkiJ/LdanHiRTMfiTTtlujAN2DzqBoSEF+ lNhlSpKxFsoNFz8PxTgKAy68QZsx7WIT0zUL/8p/fDorwYSwpMNRLzM84gvQcjYoBr3d NumQLmIEXguq4zSJzNSB9ZYM9dBzDaBQjTPkGgzbzSmj140DT4YZR/7KcIMBI8L3AyA4 5fHQ== X-Received: by 10.112.17.34 with SMTP id l2mr11096589lbd.117.1444614675574; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 18:51:15 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.217.135 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 18:50:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83fv1hqwf6.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::230 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:191296 Archived-At: --001a11c3c47c9337f20521de90fe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Do you see something that should be changed in nt/INSTALL to make such > problems less probable? When nt/INSTALL mentions automake/autoconf, perhaps there should be a note like your comment: The MinGW packages of Autoconf and Automake are not useful, I suggest to remove them. because if you're using the MinGW installer, it's quite easy to end with MinGW versions of these tools. --001a11c3c47c9337f20521de90fe Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> Do yo= u see something that should be changed in nt/INSTALL to make such
> p= roblems less probable?

When nt/INSTALL mentions au= tomake/autoconf, perhaps there should be a note like your comment:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 The MinGW packages of Autoconf and Automake are n= ot useful, I suggest=C2=A0to remove them.

because if you= 're using the MinGW installer, it's quite easy to end with MinGW ve= rsions of these tools.

--001a11c3c47c9337f20521de90fe--