From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GnuTLS for W32 Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 23:45:18 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87boqk3q69.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87aa634st8.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87fwfvsgfv.fsf@wanadoo.es> <877h17scdo.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87hb0b77nr.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8739bvs27m.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87ty4b4329.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87hb0b3yoe.fsf@lifelogs.com> <6ED011D5-E185-44C6-BB31-A445A4E5F83A@gmail.com> <87wr976otx.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ipkq6yy5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87boqi6tzz.fsf@linux-hvfx.site> <87ehve3ul8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <1mboqhzxx6.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325803568 19327 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2012 22:46:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 22:46:08 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 05 23:46:04 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Riw4R-00036l-L5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 23:46:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41836 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Riw4R-0000FE-3i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:46:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60004) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Riw4P-0000F6-5i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:46:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Riw4O-00040O-B7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:46:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:63788) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Riw4O-00040J-2e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:46:00 -0500 Original-Received: by pbdd2 with SMTP id d2so952877pbd.0 for ; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:45:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=v384a7VTi5egN94O3XAs6+d6SJR+ZzQUAsTpUdjcd+Y=; b=db46e/Faxf4WvdlB9Tx7KaAuUylosRnq/HbwIaVrlJO/dhfTmdfhaf0013wF7Vowjc hjhfEFaOc7S4U12DRH8c4ItLYuloMWLUytx3XxD6YN9wcLOleaMpfexZD3ScfXFcboht XSMk4FYif8U7fnfGbB49tvi41QVLhCnXsB6jk= Original-Received: by 10.68.73.68 with SMTP id j4mr9485329pbv.40.1325803559202; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:45:59 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.142.247.28 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:45:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1mboqhzxx6.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.160.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147362 Archived-At: On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 21:39, Richard Riley wrote: > Maybe not, but just about everyone else will. Its why they are > "defaults" : sensible choices. What I meant is that I won't use it** so I don't care which defaults are defined. All of them are equally good to me. **(Assuming we're talking about an installer for Emacs. I would use an installer for GnuTLS as a separate package.) =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma