From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com>
To: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
Cc: Emacs developers <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: On the popularity of git [Was: Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches?]
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 13:50:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAeL0SRAryqdnv-CwVmxisaiOK5w71e6sLcsNEqr8c=UgAYbsg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151029170237.GF2510@acm.fritz.box>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1915 bytes --]
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> wrote:
> I've been wondering about git's popularity for some long time. That
> git's complexity is not necessary in a powerful VCS is demonstrated by
> the counterexamples of hg and (to a lesser extent) bzr.
>
> git had (and has) Linux behind it, thus giving a lot of hackers being
> forced to learn git early on. This surely gave git a huge advantage in
> numbers at the start of the competition.
Of course there's not a single factor that made git so popular, but there
are a few ones that surely weighted in the final situation.
In no particular order:
- Not only git has Linux behind, but it has *Linus* behind. He is revered
by a lot of hackers, who give a lot of weight to his opinions.
- It's *very* fast.
- Its foundation (its data model) is seen as elegant, even if its UI is
less than friendly.
- It's very flexible and hackable, and built from basic components, in the
"software tools" spirit.
- It was perceived as a David vs Goliath thing. BitKeeper pulls out, Linus
builds a replacement in a few days.
- It really hadn't much competition. Subversion, though good, is not
distributed. Bazaar was too slow. Mercurial had no critical mass. Other
alternatives (svk, Darcs. etc.) were even more marginal.
- It had, since the beginning, an active development community. Other dVCS
have smaller development communities (think Bazaar...) so it has progressed
at a good pace.
All of these (IMHO, of course) and others that I forget surely contributed
to its gaining momentum.
Whether git is the best tool or not is largely irrelevant now. I think even
detractors have to admit it works well enough and it's fast and responsive,
and even its more ardent evangelists won't discuss its abysmal UI (whenever
I'm starting to like it, I do "git help log" and I'm suddenly cured).
My 0.02¢
Juanma
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3207 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-30 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-28 19:20 Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches? Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-28 19:44 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-28 20:00 ` Steinar Bang
2015-10-28 20:04 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2015-10-28 20:10 ` Alex Bennée
2015-10-28 22:32 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-28 22:56 ` Xue Fuqiao
2015-10-28 22:59 ` Óscar Fuentes
2015-10-28 23:53 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-29 0:17 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-10-29 0:28 ` Michael Heerdegen
2015-10-29 0:49 ` Michael Heerdegen
2015-10-29 2:25 ` Yuri Khan
2015-10-29 8:21 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-29 12:35 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-29 13:21 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-29 17:02 ` On the popularity of git [Was: Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches?] Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-29 17:22 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-29 18:08 ` John Wiegley
2015-10-30 7:48 ` Paul Eggert
2015-10-30 9:27 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-30 9:48 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-30 10:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-30 21:44 ` Paul Eggert
2015-10-30 9:09 ` joakim
2015-10-30 10:49 ` Yuri Khan
2015-10-31 3:16 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2015-10-31 8:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-31 8:32 ` Andreas Schwab
2015-10-31 11:35 ` Oleh Krehel
2015-10-31 12:19 ` David Kastrup
2015-11-02 22:01 ` Nikolaus Rath
2015-11-03 8:42 ` David Kastrup
2015-11-03 17:38 ` Nikolaus Rath
2015-10-31 16:02 ` On the popularity of git Stephen J. Turnbull
2015-11-01 8:08 ` Uwe Brauer
2015-10-31 16:50 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-31 16:58 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-11-02 22:05 ` Nikolaus Rath
2015-11-03 8:39 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-31 19:24 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2015-10-31 20:13 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-31 21:08 ` Steinar Bang
2015-10-31 21:15 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-31 21:48 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-11-01 8:17 ` Steinar Bang
2015-11-01 8:54 ` David Kastrup
2015-11-01 10:17 ` Steinar Bang
2015-11-01 11:15 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-11-02 20:11 ` John Wiegley
2015-11-03 7:00 ` Oleh Krehel
2015-11-03 10:07 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-11-03 11:58 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-11-03 13:08 ` John Wiegley
2015-11-03 13:30 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-11-03 13:38 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-11-03 13:43 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-11-03 13:49 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-11-03 13:58 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-11-03 14:14 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-11-03 14:25 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-11-03 13:43 ` Oleh Krehel
2015-11-03 14:35 ` Óscar Fuentes
2015-11-03 14:52 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-11-03 15:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-03 16:04 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-11-03 18:14 ` Óscar Fuentes
2015-11-03 19:40 ` Jay Belanger
2015-11-03 20:15 ` John Wiegley
2015-11-03 20:24 ` Drew Adams
2015-11-03 20:35 ` Changing the tone of emacs-devel (Was: On the popularity of git) John Wiegley
2015-11-03 22:05 ` Artur Malabarba
2015-11-04 7:54 ` Nicolas Petton
2015-11-03 21:47 ` Changing the subject (was: " David Kastrup
2015-11-03 23:37 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-11-04 0:27 ` John Yates
2015-11-04 1:40 ` Changing the subject Yann Hodique
2015-11-04 15:37 ` John Wiegley
2015-11-03 22:11 ` emacs-devel etiquette (was: Re: On the popularity of git) Stephen Leake
2015-11-04 11:12 ` Future emacs mailing lists. [Was: On the popularity of git] Alan Mackenzie
2015-11-04 7:52 ` On the popularity of git Stephen J. Turnbull
2015-11-03 20:53 ` Richard Stallman
2015-11-03 13:49 ` Andreas Schwab
2015-10-30 12:50 ` Juanma Barranquero [this message]
2015-10-30 14:15 ` On the popularity of git [Was: Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches?] David Kastrup
2015-10-30 16:54 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-10-30 17:31 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-29 16:31 ` Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches? Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-29 16:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-29 17:45 ` Davis Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAAeL0SRAryqdnv-CwVmxisaiOK5w71e6sLcsNEqr8c=UgAYbsg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=lekktu@gmail.com \
--cc=acm@muc.de \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.