From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How to restore the layout? Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:11:23 +0200 Message-ID: References: <51C5AA68.4000204@alice.it> <51C8B2C8.4000803@gmx.at> <51C93CDB.2020301@gmx.at> <51C9C790.3020407@gmx.at> <51CA0D4C.7080204@alice.it> <51CC3E42.7020409@alice.it> <51CC4CC1.3030202@alice.it> <51CC8403.1030009@gmx.at> <51CCA56A.8000508@gmx.at> <51CD49CF.1090103@gmx.at> <51CD5489.10902@gmx.at> <83d2r6fsbw.fsf@gnu.org> <51CD7879.1030906@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372421541 21278 80.91.229.3 (28 Jun 2013 12:12:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:12:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stephen Berman , Angelo Graziosi , Emacs developers , Stefan Monnier , Eli Zaretskii , =?UTF-8?Q?Jan_Dj=C3=A4rv?= , Jambunathan K To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 28 14:12:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UsXXF-0004d6-NG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:12:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57464 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UsXXF-00059B-8l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 08:12:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55255) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UsXX9-00053r-DC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 08:12:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UsXX7-0004Be-0N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 08:12:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ie0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c]:45918) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UsXX3-00046N-5F; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 08:12:05 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 16so4040778iea.3 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 05:12:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=rA+GP54lXjeNhg2SnJbt24i1rrzPgi+9v01RNK/1Hxk=; b=L4oSK+LsvFT+VH6uqidh6MjxNP6L4X1pL1MWch14BNJra0LTRDcjpgF/D5dixekdDW JO3rsjTHPdxBz+rkK9JAbFVXqRf9E1HR1KPBJbkIr2bjh4z9Noo8k70QS3rhJEEHRVpC Xj8wjisIN/Z59dwptBEjOWwTGiOPB0odKVc63jYea7gseMwGbXyB7JECWazVHBILczeA bN+BXbjrtIXICdFCnFctq7fR6dFTz359bCGqlnoGdBjzDEQ2Ud3whdC9BYH4fRAHIiDq igCaoneOvoEMKmtWd1S1DtbvWP0uZ24wAfTv9qh5kA58nKqXeVCUxx/qJgnHwYB4L8TQ sjTQ== X-Received: by 10.50.3.70 with SMTP id a6mr3552056iga.6.1372421524621; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 05:12:04 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.64.126.161 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 05:11:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51CD7879.1030906@gmx.at> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:161192 Archived-At: On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:50 PM, martin rudalics wrote: > This is not about maximizing but about demaximizing a maximized frame > after it has been maximized by desktop. The question was whether this > could/should restore the normal frame size of the previous session. We > already earlier agreed with Juanma that this will only restore the > default frame size of the present session. Yes. There's also the issue that, if we don't put the frame at the previous position, maximized frames (not fullscreen ones, I think) can be positioned so they are not fully visible. > I think we should do what can be done easily, like restoring the last > previous sizes (as Juanma does already). Sizes & positions are equally easy, full/max frames aside. J