From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 64-bit build on Windows Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 22:42:22 +0100 Message-ID: References: <874m0tc0gn.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87efzxn6or.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83y3y5681f.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8ak5gx4.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045cf660a275010546a1a683 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485035028 14825 195.159.176.226 (21 Jan 2017 21:43:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 21:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= , Emacs developers To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 21 22:43:42 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cV3Rk-0003FV-7e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 22:43:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33432 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cV3Rp-0001fg-A6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 16:43:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38629) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cV3RE-0001fK-Qz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 16:43:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cV3RD-0002cd-MY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 16:43:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]:33533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cV3RA-0002bi-4l; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 16:43:04 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id d140so23168527wmd.0; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:43:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5kdKG2M/aCTf+huhrzN1yxNhmnBYXLq1Rl1/6rhEqbE=; b=dlLhbOh5OBmQooT/Q1YwfmsiJZYSNWzTUDAUTt9oqts1meIg6STLMPAA0LR76A7EqT lrkofK6jrENmxVEWMJnVY/mUFM5TtdLRaCd8RAbu/3xRQ1lWbVEWYeb5EV5+bWvJI661 AFJ2KbzdWevLklAhPTnk+c91C+rotG60aeiyT/oLkhBnUU3Yj2BMOMx7xSH8Xf0Rlbk0 XnbQgUnzvlh6EgGjAQEDsoJrO/GVuji/xNf+v1v8tDoO0cOYx3fa1yXFZqG/wP5fYqca 2tjyTlS07ao0sMInat9leO6/h3nfeRaD4sR0tR5OY+9/L/8pTXCMTH5XtC5hNT6Dcf+1 MztA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5kdKG2M/aCTf+huhrzN1yxNhmnBYXLq1Rl1/6rhEqbE=; b=o9utX5+lPYKF3OyiL+fw3C0XdO5wYcGlWvvlHMc1CE0w7MC8ER//aqlC0T3q6omuZi tPcL8iajjv5pAn5YQLMGXmWJSX3K2TTrPK7BohPEnJZfVaO30ANybHQCIKufK/DGudRA zQ6dFepB6iQ2123KfwmtJnl7oZMtW+gD2xeaZZoVLiqS6VzYe1ny+0CeW6mkfVCJiSfl lYTY3PFInq7vyFQQxPzborG/ZeHejlQMDye8NqUl5I+JsXOkvUS6j3+OsUyILVnn1Kps TWe3Me3dZ3jr1N3nU6fG9Ey6daXqlMtIbbhL8FTJ0sZsgXK5R4TNah/7P2D/FPmxyWsy iy2w== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIM7XwE1+c4rxZGCycAXq4wosMayQae70zLsB5MpcWdZifJbOym5sJ6+110G/9EZveyHjq5dML8P2nGTQ== X-Received: by 10.223.173.43 with SMTP id p40mr17186525wrc.163.1485034982894; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:43:02 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.195.24.3 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:42:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83a8ak5gx4.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::232 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211504 Archived-At: --f403045cf660a275010546a1a683 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > but please wait for a few days to give MinGW64 users a > chance to comment on this. One question for them, then. Could it be that I have mingw(32|64).exe instead of mingw(32|64)_shell.bat because I followed the advice at http://msys2.github.io/ and did a post-installation update with pacman -Sy pacman pacman -Syu pacman -Su ? If so, it's this something we should recommend in nt/INSTALL.W64? --f403045cf660a275010546a1a683 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> but p= lease wait for a few days to give MinGW64 users a
> chance to comment= on this.

One question for them, then. Could it be that I have= mingw(32|64).exe instead of mingw(32|64)_shell.bat because I followed the = advice at http://msys2.github.io/ a= nd did a post-installation update with

=C2=A0 pacman -Sy pacman
= =C2=A0 pacman -Syu
=C2=A0 pacman -Su

? If so, = it's this something we should recommend in nt/INSTALL.W64?
--f403045cf660a275010546a1a683--