From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14886: Fwd: A significant slowdown calling font-lock-fontify-buffer from a hook Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 13:42:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83ip0a2xlb.fsf@gnu.org> <83ehay2vgw.fsf@gnu.org> <837ggp3kcb.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1374061457 22209 80.91.229.3 (17 Jul 2013 11:44:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 14886@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 17 13:44:16 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UzQ9R-0007oi-Ae for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 13:44:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60773 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UzQ9Q-0006gn-K0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 07:44:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57862) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UzQ9M-0006gU-9J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 07:44:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UzQ9K-0000Mj-WE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 07:44:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37727) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UzQ9K-0000Me-TF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 07:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UzQ9J-0008W0-Uv; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 07:44:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14886 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-Xcc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: via spool by 14886-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14886.137406141832675 (code B ref 14886); Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:44:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14886) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jul 2013 11:43:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60275 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UzQ8v-0008Ux-Jk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 07:43:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ee0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50]:40602) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UzQ8s-0008Ua-UR for 14886@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 07:43:35 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ee0-f50.google.com with SMTP id d49so968400eek.37 for <14886@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 04:43:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=5h2ioZvV3i58JnpF54a4kaJSe5zbCqYDtr5KX3I6XHI=; b=PyFmkXsH6UUvo1Do9Boiyp02k0jf/PrD+ZKq6p4t8p8DtdzbdFv+/LMFRJgpT6GXJU lUbG5guKCSx9deVs8xqoTIgf94HQ+ZC2ige3DoMCLFtBgs2ttTtVCSSEfeYp8Zn02iqO f10nHGF/jT78/m012XlH2txxfboT5XzOAQ0RReThq8wDAbqbVHjq97SGOXMpp21P65+X kTZdR7TVByy4Mflpbeb8pfwhLueuEio7H1ikLdDGDa4X5OjIkk8EAqkyGL0g384NvCwO whoFRROPNKDUSA0xzfFgcJ1BzF/buX7lLSC8aYRAZRcw3fnuwaAd4tSinf1iU9H0NyRL 0X3A== X-Received: by 10.15.76.71 with SMTP id m47mr5979064eey.70.1374061408952; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 04:43:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.14.142.4 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 04:42:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:76421 Archived-At: X-Debbugs-Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu Anyway, in my original report, emacs -Q --eval "(add-hook 'prog-mode-hook #'font-lock-fontify-buffer)" src/xdisp.c -f kill-emacs an optimized 24.3 build was slower than a non-opt trunk one (both compiled with gcc 4.7.2). However, with your test case, non-opt trunk is 30s slower than non-opt 24.3, and optimized trunk needs less than a third of the time of non-opt trunk (though glyph assertions are enabled, which could affect the result)... A shoot in the dark: Could all this be related to Paul's substitution of many macros by inline functions? Paul, WDYT? Juanma