From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 14:32:34 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87383xk4ia.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c38750cc25660513ffba75 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429363970 23034 80.91.229.3 (18 Apr 2015 13:32:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 13:32:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: =?UTF-8?B?VGF5bGFuIFVscmljaCBCYXnEsXJsxLEvS2FtbWVy?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 18 15:32:49 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YjSrY-0003Dx-Oi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 15:32:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45727 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjSrY-0008L2-5J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 09:32:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41909) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjSrM-0008Kt-VG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 09:32:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjSrM-0001lF-4X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 09:32:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::235]:34347) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjSrL-0001l3-Rh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 09:32:36 -0400 Original-Received: by lbcga7 with SMTP id ga7so101629468lbc.1 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 06:32:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=G0Vdk/TCNnQRCU6SNUC8YUuicpOLkyziDLFE8Uyo+ms=; b=sgGQSMGkH1+S6Xnn1Kl6vnSBmCkwvQw58qeeC+OAvI5dgRJvHpVKylhqPC0Cr7bmYN DNc8BGsrfQsYMRTDTL+j5kf8u15LHxwKLLa20LUPWVg2ZY7/PFsDrgCTf24KHHf5koK0 iTbycAEYmlwrup+M4wVCk/hvGySbnQGrxXFj94StUh7qyDKd0jUZAzk4CQdVNyoQsRAX qYm8ofofpjhqPPd0N0G9hEUBSztEYaGpGu8lFwtqe6+gUrteZ+j8KvcOiNNKJoiyWnBm Qx9EC5v33oKQTGPwq4Scm79aRqPzlO143+QsJYbggWMNySz2Kne5gAA+NRqkx48lxWuh Johw== X-Received: by 10.112.200.230 with SMTP id jv6mr8426750lbc.21.1429363955080; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 06:32:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.150.1 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 06:32:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.150.1 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 06:32:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87383xk4ia.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> X-Google-Sender-Auth: c4u5CG5Iq-XOOn6r0D48N5oCtPU X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:185582 Archived-At: --001a11c38750cc25660513ffba75 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > has it been considered yet to simply support an optional > > ~/.emacs.d/pre-package-init.el Yes. I suggested this on a previous thread (before starting this one) and someone complained of yet another file affecting emacs behaviour. Then I suggested the streamlined version of that in the first email of this thread (having a file that delays initialization, but doesn't actually get evaluated), and the few responses I got still preferred the other option. --001a11c38750cc25660513ffba75 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> has it been considered yet to simply support an optiona= l
>
> =C2=A0 ~/.emacs.d/pre-package-init.el

Yes. I suggested this on a previous thread (before starting = this one) and someone complained of yet another file affecting emacs behavi= our. Then I suggested the streamlined version of that in the first email of= this thread (having a file that delays initialization, but doesn't act= ually get evaluated), and the few responses I got still preferred the other= option.

--001a11c38750cc25660513ffba75--