From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:16:58 +0000 Message-ID: References: <947A3DE2-06B1-43EB-B3B3-DA1DE7EFA611@sanityinc.com> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11432b32108a5e052b47e29f X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454962637 3406 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2016 20:17:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:17:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Steve Purcell Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 08 21:17:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aSsFG-0003CV-JS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:17:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48457 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSsFG-0003i7-1V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:17:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46309) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSsF2-0003hj-6E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:17:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSsF1-0000tm-ED for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:17:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yk0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22c]:35404) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSsF1-0000tL-9g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:16:59 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-yk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id r207so92147067ykd.2 for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:16:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CNDx1QpCxoQNAIq45drLLKIpajcbziSu+YDLBPy4kng=; b=xUWyDzC7B1EM7CHA0rr8wwCJLzDUmla5Days7rZtBBxtZy57/j7+7lzRrQXGxAK5E0 UkSA8/9hr4esGYk+5ESH0XdfF2m5ZbTQU4OO1GtTGw3wxN5G1+8EQj6obdTJwU9kPU/r 3HBR/wxj/6O7LU1kz13dAZtC3aOGviZMSNpRpqCu5voj0pJwJX90OmANQ5680t2/8d2R RzHttVOzB/+pKvZhh2z4lEt4FCKNk8sjMnQ29TJYPozlDLFQRuQon/l9b0e5oIRFZy3h 4JEwNfPzlV4q7Ms92hzPGynybeDruz9Fwv/usta+8+LDsm2jYOGMihqcqaAYH0Bh7cH7 CZnQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CNDx1QpCxoQNAIq45drLLKIpajcbziSu+YDLBPy4kng=; b=CiqOuNvdAT5NZUbUf/9vb6LM54w6IbS048bpYVrUkq/tLYdL4ABi5oMCtq1Q0xMgub m2RDpub9h+jVHCHb/wn/lbhtCMbRvuchHQ9+FuVFNQr0PzjXpzABnng8pKqd15iyuEKG ohTCRNw+syc/JRio6d81XKpw15qjC27icb3qXL/tYlKgxUk2qR3Jk0EhNn8rnB7nqhnl RDjjaEtNM81lsJCiU+qiGXt0NaBwtUmcdbvutX9zSLLFVjGfMJT9/MqSj0gYF5IcJ0DG 4lPDoPRmATU/1XOBoptRJisEzJgG0dvyRKzg4SNBm41/4aRJeLlZtgva6UgZbDFABipf cC1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORPOi0RAq/yyAgAEbrSgNSK2bDAjTxPymSpXYS0XGQNB433OFzhGbu88y4mhyxTbkqJwPxRie9tFRMe8Q== X-Received: by 10.37.40.10 with SMTP id o10mr16330548ybo.6.1454962618956; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:16:58 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.129.32.134 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 12:16:58 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.129.32.134 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 12:16:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <947A3DE2-06B1-43EB-B3B3-DA1DE7EFA611@sanityinc.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: mWoQc2g9htujo4fiHpDw1FMJZPs X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:199554 Archived-At: --001a11432b32108a5e052b47e29f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 8 Feb 2016 5:05 pm, "Steve Purcell" wrote: > Yes, possibly. And in fact :alnum: would be better than :alpha:, of course=E2=80=A6 > > And since the rules for database names are probably much the same as for other SQL identifiers, there=E2=80=99s a chance \\s (symbol constituent) wo= uld work too. Yes. I'm not familiar with the fine details of SQL syntax, but \\w\\|\\s is generally a better bet than just \\w. --001a11432b32108a5e052b47e29f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 8 Feb 2016 5:05 pm, "Steve Purcell" <steve@sanityinc.com> wrote:
> Yes, possibly. And in fact :alnum: would be better than :alpha:, of co= urse=E2=80=A6
>
> And since the rules for database names are probably much the same as f= or other SQL identifiers, there=E2=80=99s a chance \\s (symbol constituent)= would work too.

Yes. I'm not familiar with the fine details of SQL synta= x, but \\w\\|\\s is generally a better bet than just \\w.

--001a11432b32108a5e052b47e29f--