From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ASCII-folded search [was: Re: Upcoming loss of usability ...] Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 17:46:32 +0100 Message-ID: References: <390c25d4-2050-4131-8a38-31ae09454541@default> <83d20h6rue.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c243e25a6ea2051982992a X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1435423613 25751 80.91.229.3 (27 Jun 2015 16:46:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 16:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Drew Adams , emacs-devel To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 27 18:46:52 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z8tFk-0007Nk-7o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 18:46:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36154 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z8tFj-0002dR-Gx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:46:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38482) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z8tFW-0002dM-5s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:46:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z8tFV-0007i3-46 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:46:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-la0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::236]:34750) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z8tFT-0007h1-Bo; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:46:35 -0400 Original-Received: by lagx9 with SMTP id x9so85744606lag.1; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 09:46:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=pnMXObWRc2bNH7TH6BRkBuYfe6Msl8o/iMlRz1NlgxM=; b=yjE9nFKBu7HPkqqqcU0TSpF/P25vcFWt4d8T890hp8PBetfLMLuBs+JeoczyhtY6Xz lZtRw7duGGy58PAPJrC2SLZb5ke8UE1P7IpitRZlF4ppsiW5xj6xTynvSN7iFpafvw4/ ZO6/1LnZIaQM/VWoQGVMGf63WIQck4+7WreVFePy+Utt38PJc1opQesx69dDnefxxeSj 5OBcfykp2D/KL0m+s9mH3JRzZLIhIYN3/4RTRXtlStI1RsbVyu/zzGXxeYdClbKJ5lpj bso89PeLfnXmGqEugaXzzHqsELbAuNt3P/SCIvKICFzdSIo6x81rurH6eKVAqtbQ6g/C 4WCg== X-Received: by 10.152.7.239 with SMTP id m15mr6382706laa.95.1435423592834; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 09:46:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.214.133 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 09:46:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.214.133 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 09:46:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83d20h6rue.fsf@gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: uuvm9k0C433F6ziavFrXEHkM_9E X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c03::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:187597 Archived-At: --001a11c243e25a6ea2051982992a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > I'm guessing that the feature you are talking about is the char > > folding that Bruce/Artur installed, and *not* the suggestion by > > Kaushal to "take over the mode line" and use "a lot of space to > > verbosely display the searching options". Just to be fair, it was I (Artur) who suggested taking over the mode line (and I've changed my mind against that now too). Kaushal's suggestion was more discrete. --001a11c243e25a6ea2051982992a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

> > I'm guessing that the feature you are talking about is the char
> > folding that Bruce/Artur installed, and *not* the suggestion by
> > Kaushal to "take over the mode line" and use "a lot of space to
> > verbosely display the searching options".

Just to be fair, it was I (Artur) who suggested taking over the mode line (and I've changed my mind against that now too). Kaushal's suggestion was more discrete.

--001a11c243e25a6ea2051982992a--