From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [elpa]: I possibly broke something Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 20:13:02 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87r3j3whoz.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449173603 13765 80.91.229.3 (3 Dec 2015 20:13:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 20:13:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?UTF-8?B?RGF2aWQgR29uesOhbGV6IEfDoW5kYXJh?= , emacs-devel To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 03 21:13:23 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a4aFm-0004qL-4l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 21:13:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37279 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4aFl-0001h0-Ix for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 15:13:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42009) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4aFV-0001gg-MO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 15:13:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4aFU-0003jb-Ug for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 15:13:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::236]:34675) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4aFT-0003hR-Ei; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 15:13:03 -0500 Original-Received: by lbbcs9 with SMTP id cs9so8535166lbb.1; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 12:13:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CTQ4KF35yNbx+duZOWqPbRJM8Jr/lPTCvxOK85KkRDg=; b=A2u1vV96PerAfDLAet4vNaUacwLP/06FkFEW4Y+bFU6VUJNKXWohNc+O9myjLTREgC Ia9ZRpoUovM2F4CgM0KgoBqiUSuG2WJHC11uYZpLxb/KFhiaH0Q4GxUfHYLJQ5/t+lKu fwQ2OSxTtr1mOyzm+UNxlO0Y5bNvLk7V5S/5LXdu9/ZHuTIjUKza9K6M0FH04isB1IdI Y+dWU+5vCHpu207Ip+MMX+byeGCXmcCVgU7HucQcwomcDPswufjfkX2Y1ul/Py4oBZ2X l975e2s2SO3LSob3LYO6oeMgn7WagGZMPEpUTn96lR5GfIhKvV8HW8pACS4xzifidMIS uxAQ== X-Received: by 10.112.170.7 with SMTP id ai7mr6638655lbc.102.1449173582445; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 12:13:02 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.202.99 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 12:13:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87r3j3whoz.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: dul0SZEmUxtVhWGGZOMYMSI_FQ8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195828 Archived-At: 2015-12-03 17:44 GMT+00:00 David Kastrup : > How would you check using git-blame that he did not accidentally revert > changes in a bad merge? Neither the old nor the new lines would be > traced to him. I had already checked (and stated) earlier that he didn't revert anything (with the diffs). Now I just checked whether he had "taken ownership" of any previous changes (with blame).