From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: serving ELPA over HTTP/S Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 15:53:32 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87oam08ofr.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k2wo8kd7.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87d22g8h7d.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871tiw86ez.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k2wn9ket.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1430837642 23198 80.91.229.3 (5 May 2015 14:54:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 14:54:02 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 05 16:53:54 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YpeEM-0000ho-56 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 16:53:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39810 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YpeEL-0006Vp-Gl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 10:53:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47521) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YpeE3-0006Vi-0C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 10:53:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YpeE2-0003Y3-7Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 10:53:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f]:34840) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YpeE1-0003Xd-VF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 10:53:34 -0400 Original-Received: by lbbuc2 with SMTP id uc2so130356207lbb.2 for ; Tue, 05 May 2015 07:53:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MOTHqireEL5nlJkLyIW/Yj4kca20iMGBUbXp6QgRMvg=; b=WaFPgtFk6/uD/R52xAg/6sSBi6YiuCVfPd45SQacLBDiDDN+ddKq0cDxcg6RgtOhTI DSUUEN9d4G545QzITkPUL0ktn/3ZQW0leltdTOkKcj7FkWahkWEzFUsnd4dyho89yeAQ 6XnglFNHyeR1seCxuMHpjuc4cJrF+IACzXKy7OLekYQRuM3HYLXeGzUYn1hg+mDzArSz e/QnwLPSOLYkGblYiahhSS4zHbx/Ygy2R7l3+qz2bxpjfT6swlqDer/DGJA7qSjGW2pZ kX4Gvro6LuHf3nfPvIeLxuNhlXK4+RQ3GI9I9D+DW1cBi/EMhHvF3RuODlsCgY5kMnvy 4DTQ== X-Received: by 10.112.200.230 with SMTP id jv6mr24388766lbc.21.1430837612798; Tue, 05 May 2015 07:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.150.1 with HTTP; Tue, 5 May 2015 07:53:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87k2wn9ket.fsf@lifelogs.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: c4-TFk5e5PDhMZa9tGpN6rkOzXU X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186236 Archived-At: > Please consider how many other package managers allow multiple URLs. Is > there a real disadvantage to allowing a list for `package-archives' > entries, especially since it degrades gracefully to the current format? The only disadvantage I can see would be an added layer of complexity to the archive-refreshing code. Because there is now support for async refreshing, it is not a simple matter of doing a loop over the urls. I'm not saying it would be horribly complicated (in fact, I'm perfectly willing to do it myself).