From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 14bb519: * lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el: New "external" package status Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 20:30:48 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20150507151357.4431.95466@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <20150507191241.GA6090@acm.fritz.box> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1431027058 4548 80.91.229.3 (7 May 2015 19:30:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 19:30:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 07 21:30:58 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YqRVX-0003IN-NM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 May 2015 21:30:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52612 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YqRVW-0004UH-Gl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 May 2015 15:30:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58356) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YqRVT-0004U1-2r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 May 2015 15:30:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YqRVS-0005AL-18 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 May 2015 15:30:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-la0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::233]:33350) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YqRVR-0005A7-Pb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 May 2015 15:30:49 -0400 Original-Received: by layy10 with SMTP id y10so38129817lay.0 for ; Thu, 07 May 2015 12:30:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=qESONeWIJHzckk3xzecJUaXnKczBR5xdMNWgTzARPQQ=; b=vUKiJMipQUQKF58vYiuculjSx6v5MLb3PAW96FAqDcGVUbZYEGfxfiFL7/wZ1cvPs6 4SutA/BuxHMp0VFyWJP1Qw09EIpGDmYJaJd1kb8yiBzJgpMcn04HN6j5Q0263yfFP1U6 GELF2yGQgh5eqZz+9rLUsnaxnzDXIPTTQhE67iD8l/buU6OXl/Zwig3KzjmOv1EXRkZ4 tF3a/LFpULkIlkF9RVIbUnjdBKzl4TLqVNiTP+3Eojxs6IftQ3YWS49Dmeeq67Bk/R73 ki8oLPo04redFhyZCr4fnWx+UUpS4B+LP6NHPZzewFBr5okQN96iG5zn+LU72nwIBkm/ v+Zg== X-Received: by 10.112.97.202 with SMTP id ec10mr173919lbb.4.1431027048909; Thu, 07 May 2015 12:30:48 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.150.1 with HTTP; Thu, 7 May 2015 12:30:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150507191241.GA6090@acm.fritz.box> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 74WpOboncPFdDmybNIz8uODcHms X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c03::233 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186322 Archived-At: 2015-05-07 20:12 GMT+01:00 Alan Mackenzie : > Hello, Artur. > > On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 07:47:29PM +0100, Artur Malabarba wrote: >> 2015-05-07 19:17 GMT+01:00 Stefan Monnier : >> >> An external package is any installed package that's not built-in >> >> and not from `package-user-dir', which usually means it's from an >> >> entry in `package-directory-list'. They are treated much like >> >> built-in packages, in that they cannot be through the Package Menu >> >> deleted and are not considered for upgrades. > > The word order "they cannot be through the Package Menu deleted" is > wrong in English (it would be correct in German ;-). The correct word > order is "they cannot be deleted through the Package menu". I don't > think there's any reason to capitalise "menu" either, though I can see > "Package" might want to be capitalised. > > Please consider amending your patch to the documentation. Oops. I wish I could use German as an excuse, but it was really a typo. :-(