From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bitten by lexical-binding Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 14:12:13 +0000 Message-ID: References: <9b834ee9-4f63-42ca-98b4-c0f14986642e@default> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448201549 1463 80.91.229.3 (22 Nov 2015 14:12:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 14:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 22 15:12:28 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a0VNT-0002L0-8s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 15:12:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56217 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0VNT-0006Yw-DS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 09:12:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59377) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0VNH-0006Yb-6y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 09:12:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0VNG-0006NU-Hf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 09:12:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::229]:32964) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0VNG-0006NQ-Ae for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 09:12:14 -0500 Original-Received: by lfaz4 with SMTP id z4so93722315lfa.0 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 06:12:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=aSvB+0WBwuPVBJ8Oz0nsEFPPTKVm/8BxJ5QBqpi5ZzA=; b=JbLY6l2GvCZgKjTKpjW07/wondTB3MQkmEPkvGRV2W+RGCxhKNBmbGKiAcLqMGOprm fwy9mGj89GKjlqtdbTzEFKpzrPZCB3dmRQ17Jip1CLhU/xfsi+MjB9LZKORvF6bJ7jfx ilXg9lvGoKGx9fIEh3Wf86S9mXDd+IHNXcekZE/t5DYpHPkX8NG+fJM0FAZ0ZapP67HR LSD6ZUMI6ou1DX8+6kkDHXIaIn+09e6Gdrl33dBvc7ueQvfoqv0qPdYO7ycyg8RwES1H EYxeYz885qR181dLfuGPY+NXNLfD+lTVE3O/mWAhUFRkK4TIsSbQaF+j2Bx29a85Daef dZcQ== X-Received: by 10.25.18.92 with SMTP id h89mr5498064lfi.54.1448201533404; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 06:12:13 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.202.99 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 06:12:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9b834ee9-4f63-42ca-98b4-c0f14986642e@default> X-Google-Sender-Auth: Vh0CWma-fd6LNPG49-C3ap_0HRg X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195013 Archived-At: > It turned out (though I do not understand completely) that > the only thing I needed to do was to add a `lexical-binding' > declaration to my file. (Luckily, the code in the file did > not depend on dynamic binding.) >From what I understand, lexical-binding definitely shouldn't have affected this. Do you think you can come up with some self-contained reproduction steps?