From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 23:20:47 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87vb98csu1.fsf@red-bean.com> <83si4cjnyw.fsf@gnu.org> <87twosp5ke.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87fv0cm64g.fsf@gmx.us> <87si4bsktk.fsf@red-bean.com> <87wptnlbl6.fsf@gmx.us> <87pozfl2ut.fsf@gmx.us> <87d1vfl17p.fsf@gmx.us> <878u63p6sh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87pozfchq6.fsf@red-bean.com> <87h9komkty.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87ziydbgnd.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447802457 28579 80.91.229.3 (17 Nov 2015 23:20:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 23:20:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Kastrup , Pierpaolo Bernardi , emacs-devel To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 18 00:20:56 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZypYV-0001eC-Ss for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:20:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32848 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZypYV-0003i5-6e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:20:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47965) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZypYR-0003hB-9U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:20:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZypYQ-0005hH-GT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:20:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::230]:35892) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZypYO-0005gq-O3; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:20:48 -0500 Original-Received: by lbblt2 with SMTP id lt2so14848100lbb.3; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 15:20:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=I9xA21hu5XS88PT+IApX/3nG4i7Cp7MRBOu9i5O9rFA=; b=WHl9YM/EwNexvTJmckzSSwS2WEQW12iGbtLeveB3HVBe4vIyNytBUMAqeKAfO2TkVu 8cnYVKim5Kl6B43/OlVt+logI/RJAI6+VJR2XbGFUYEcN3/C9EX9622a4trgNL5myBjF E1EdgsdwDoDZLQyjRAi1iXv8RRJDcGFyTSb49YD+FmM0ll11UrZvxcPGkB3u5tVsmr40 OlIOyKjp47brxcRnOlQgsMXCWo047bBzIvBX1Xu72g0b5aII/4DRJfbdETnIrs7OSOz5 PUBo1jgzp6bEkDL+KZpcEha2W0VArx7UcNxPpV14XXg9YZ8kX8FKdT5WR2g+ew+zlo8p RBRA== X-Received: by 10.112.35.196 with SMTP id k4mr21443658lbj.3.1447802447549; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 15:20:47 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.202.99 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 15:20:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ziydbgnd.fsf@red-bean.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4LApMpmU7-WVxMfpBejo61IblAQ X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::230 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194679 Archived-At: 2015-11-17 0:42 GMT+00:00 Karl Fogel : > Artur, it sounds to me like there is not yet consensus on what C-o should do at column >0. There have been plausible arguments both ways. I just want to say I haven't forgotten about this thread. I'm 1 week away from the most important day of the last 3 years for me, so I'm going to be absent for 7 more days. After that, this thread is one of the first things on my list. And don't worry about the timing of the release branch. I'm considering this a bugfix, so I'll keep my change feature-freeze-safe (there's a decent chance I'll just revert).