From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A few questions about open-line Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 23:34:53 +0100 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445726113 2965 80.91.229.3 (24 Oct 2015 22:35:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 22:35:13 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 25 00:35:08 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zq7P1-0001MM-Vw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 00:35:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45885 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zq7P1-00077f-2S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 18:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58076) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zq7Op-00077a-7A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 18:34:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zq7Oo-0001ZO-GT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 18:34:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::235]:33925) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zq7Oo-0001ZF-8f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 18:34:54 -0400 Original-Received: by lfaz124 with SMTP id z124so115058505lfa.1 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:34:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jQuPPBECbPgMuIesOkXSaCbpwKJFXcsnhUVrVgPiCxE=; b=1D8K3cuyVn4WPRS1XIabLITNFH5V0OWeMFhEdZIUazUFaM1YPwFYKpuTpVIfTxd7V9 QfFA04WgKE0xjavu2LzE366km42nfGeIXUxUObiuTjKB5/fo2LK9zxG5e60xkwxaR+Ml SWoAmgZCRKD+Fd+viTRuMDBOr+YtA4hoW7ScUTR9xM0kPHmXtDc306VaiPRzoDueGGP7 Iw5xfJES3RikbshlMYFGaXpMtI/+PDtnCrXt1CAKpJKRndVUCsTcG0tCYikHYAsJKrv9 coCca+tnFofa/edAt7UYBweBD4pbekfjEiMEwznDhYwU7vZSwZzfljj92l1Pc8ZVVzqa DbIg== X-Received: by 10.112.235.65 with SMTP id uk1mr13595916lbc.118.1445726093472; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:34:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.112.91.106 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:34:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: Zl9eliZV7u9wWUxDU-UuuAZs2Bw X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:192591 Archived-At: > 2. After the last (goto-char loc), is there any situation where the > point isn't already at the end of the line? Why is that end-of-line > necessary? After a lot of testing, I see it's necessary in case a left-margin was inserted.