From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposal for a closed-buffer tracker Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:53:39 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83a906c58q.fsf@gnu.org> <54EA56E2.3020205@yandex.ru> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1135e5a8c3012e050fc1ba09 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1424699632 13649 80.91.229.3 (23 Feb 2015 13:53:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Kelly Dean , Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 23 14:53:51 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YPtSJ-0003fK-FG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:53:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43635 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YPtSI-0005qv-Nj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 08:53:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50371) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YPtSB-0005qa-GL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 08:53:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YPtSA-0008TE-Eg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 08:53:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-la0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::231]:39115) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YPtS8-0008Sm-S7; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 08:53:41 -0500 Original-Received: by labgq15 with SMTP id gq15so18538285lab.6; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 05:53:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=BqTZIlLHBvEzgKoiCFBggecqlvl9MiRV50gl4NsNEj8=; b=EqS5x1MP8n8rFd/BEI5t+ldu6v540byRy6vh6muMxsK4nznycMik4obC82BdbeCJbf H6JG9O8PH1oV/pQBLG3WbroIZtgBK72WiaVyWPjoGgxig7D2MoPCbVpKWrXSkiL6HjkT O9XxULzSrYIIRaAjKHGn/nlLu7/PjILiXjWjj9yDZKf52nppc37bedwHIfLO2xGBT+ZF 9uqqQiUi39yNf85ApHlXc/wTFnFfp7l5nZiCZsdekTwUE3juvJDNpkpmE08f2hIcvcyO frTA5b8vx9OC8p0WKPjhhCloknvj9yfk1fOyRMuyYdGosrHdke7iipj5GMbIH3LwIymk lKQA== X-Received: by 10.112.36.69 with SMTP id o5mr9986305lbj.59.1424699619997; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 05:53:39 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.49.9 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 05:53:39 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.49.9 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 05:53:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54EA56E2.3020205@yandex.ru> X-Google-Sender-Auth: -Vd19oAtB2cSaQrr6Y_b6AXARpc X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c03::231 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:183421 Archived-At: --001a1135e5a8c3012e050fc1ba09 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Feb 22, 2015 7:23 PM, "Dmitry Gutov" wrote: > > On 02/23/2015 12:03 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote: > >> I consider it good practice to use #' rather than ' when >> referring to a function rather than to a symbol (tho it's not used very >> widely right now). > > > It's been gaining in popularity recently. > > https://github.com/bbatsov/emacs-lisp-style-guide/commit/26a37b77af54614a41437906f8062fb1744e5889 Not to mention Emacs source should try to set an example. So IMO, yes, please do that. --001a1135e5a8c3012e050fc1ba09 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

On Feb 22, 2015 7:23 PM, "Dmitry Gutov" <dgutov@yandex.ru> wrote:
>
> On 02/23/2015 12:03 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
>> I consider it good practice to use #'<name> rather than '<name> when
>> referring to a function rather than to a symbol (tho it's not used very
>> widely right now).
>
>
> It's been gaining in popularity recently.
>
> https://github.com/bbatsov/emacs-lisp-style-guide/commit/26a37b77af54614a41437906f8062fb1744e5889

Not to mention Emacs source should try to set an example. So IMO, yes, please do that.

--001a1135e5a8c3012e050fc1ba09--