From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lax matching is not a great default behavior Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 23:31:18 +0000 Message-ID: References: <837fl2qzs2.fsf@gnu.org> <83610ikvto.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb8iqa0l.fsf@udel.edu> <87k2oyymjv.fsf@udel.edu> <83r3j6j5vj.fsf@gnu.org> <83poyqj5qb.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449012686 2821 80.91.229.3 (1 Dec 2015 23:31:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 23:31:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Mark Oteiza , emacs-devel To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 02 00:31:26 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a3uOL-0003xD-46 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 00:31:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55379 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3uOK-0006Tb-6i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 18:31:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33035) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3uOH-0006TV-Pc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 18:31:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3uOH-0006D6-4e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 18:31:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::22e]:35770) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3uOF-0006Cp-Cm; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 18:31:19 -0500 Original-Received: by lfdl133 with SMTP id l133so29401205lfd.2; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 15:31:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mu1GFzNsac5h8a5eMgFRbqtpJPYhmubBoaITSx23yE8=; b=ZoUTmUG/KVkl4yfPfoSgwsyEdJdXHN4jgwetwhGHdtncAe2mSLo8BNaypOfWLS+fu1 ZQtjfIVo9jpO4QtYPuBT3dT1CWZJTAjvjo1TA6gQhnzv0J02RGtxtihu5zR9/opiVzn1 WL1meERiwUg+AJ3MUeUJ+P4h9F7z0PRc38GA24SZVq78bmS3EdymeoL0iAomUZznSBdF +DKk85CwCquwhmdDPkOZwWpUBjFuPee5eVHcbdBSad6Bv6/ksosbkThI8jzVzEhgzs/O IR9CQlDjsTDtfEMr9Ph0p2sgDpDue4N53GnWAYuc4IXWTqxYdMSwPSvb8Ki8IMGeZGjA BUjQ== X-Received: by 10.112.126.106 with SMTP id mx10mr68943lbb.3.1449012678567; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 15:31:18 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.202.99 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:31:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83poyqj5qb.fsf@gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: k3iBYSwpvivP4pmlLzDQjQMGBYQ X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::22e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195723 Archived-At: 2015-12-01 20:04 GMT+00:00 Eli Zaretskii : >> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 22:01:04 +0200 >> From: Eli Zaretskii >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> The first match is almost instantaneous here; it's the next one, >> especially if it fails, is slow. >> >> So it doesn't seem to be the search itself, it's something else that's >> at work here. > > Seems to be lazy-highlight. Set isearch-lazy-highlight to nil, and > Bob's your uncle. If lazy-highlighting adds a lag before the user can move to the second match, then we need to fix lazy-highlighting to not block input.